Controversial opinion on sets
-
I have stated this previously but I have almost finished every set as a NMS offline player so I am in favor of sets. I couldn’t do this for collections in previous years as I would have the voucher easily for MA cards but didn’t have enough of other series of cards. This year all cards held the same value in sets.
Issue I have as with others is I think it should be a progression with no 99s to start because I don’t need 3 99 Schwarbers and I get confused which I have and I don’t for creating a lineup
-
So your oppinion is on set-collections not sets?
The collection thing is basically the same. Buy cards as they are low in price, so you do not have to buy at a high price. If you follow that principle, every collection is/was easy … If supply drops, prices go highThe set-thing will not make sense, if there is a power creep, because cards will become mediocre as the sets/creep continues
-
@nymets1987_PSN It’s because people like him so they look for an excuse to keep churning him out. Same for De La Cruz who also has 3. I never used either of them but at least you can justify a homerun derby card and a post season card for Schwarber vs made up fantasy land cards for De La Cruz.
-
Only one Daniel Vogelbach and it was a 95. They did that man wrong. I got him to P5 so he plays as a 100 in my heart!
-
@Dookie-Possum If you look really closely at that card, I think there's a dragonfly in front of his face. Best card art this year.
