Everytime, every year I replace my players with a 99 version only to seriously regret it. This year my 95 Betts has .286 and 48 home runs. My 99 Betts has started 1-16. My Larry Walker was batting 316 with 26 home runs, 99 Walker, .091 0 Hrs. After I put 95/98 Walker back in, 1st game he hit 2 home runs. It just doesn't make sense, I've had the same experience every year I play this game. I lost 4 straight games after adding 99 Betts and Walker. Both are now out of my lineup and Walker was a rage sell. I'll never upgrade a card again just because he's a 99. Btw, average the numbers, how do they even come up with 99?
I hate 99s.....
@ScottD_3Ds_PSN said in I hate 99s.....:
Everytime, every year I replace my players with a 99 version only to seriously regret it. This year my 95 Betts has .286 and 48 home runs. My 99 Betts has started 1-16. My Larry Walker was batting 316 with 26 home runs, 99 Walker, .091 0 Hrs. After I put 95/98 Walker back in, 1st game he hit 2 home runs. It just doesn't make sense, I've had the same experience every year I play this game. I lost 4 straight games after adding 99 Betts and Walker. Both are now out of my lineup and Walker was a rage sell. I'll never upgrade a card again just because he's a 99. Btw, average the numbers, how do they even come up with 99?
Is either the lower rated Betts or Walker P4 or P5?
I mean, you probably had rough stretches with all your lower versions to. Perhaps you just didn't have it today
@eatyum_PSN said in I hate 99s.....:
I mean, you probably had rough stretches with all your lower versions to. Perhaps you just didn't have it today
That happens a lot, I tend to always start with .0-- averages when I just get a card, but give it some time and I'll have them up to .250-.350 (pretty much my BA) Prime example for me was Cano, I started like 0-20 (probably an exaggeration but that's how it felt) with him and he's .310 now for me