I was thinking about this years finest cards and…
-
Just realized we’re likely to get a 99 120+ h/9 Corbin Burnes. We all know how nuts his potm was when it came out. A finest would be crazy. I went like 16-3 with his potm card.
-
@twisted-_-tea-_psn said in I was thinking about this years finest cards and…:
Just realized we’re likely to get a 99 120+ h/9 Corbin Burnes. We all know how nuts his potm was when it came out. A finest would be crazy. I went like 16-3 with his potm card.
I think they slowed down the maxed out 120+ h/9 attribute. Look at the TA4 cards, most of them hover around 100. I think it was their way of saying the maxed out guys are too OP
Oh and that Burnes POTM wasn’t very good once you saw him a few times. Half decent but I always hit him hard. Great pitches, no deception
-
@hikes83_psn said in I was thinking about this years finest cards and…:
@twisted-_-tea-_psn said in I was thinking about this years finest cards and…:
Just realized we’re likely to get a 99 120+ h/9 Corbin Burnes. We all know how nuts his potm was when it came out. A finest would be crazy. I went like 16-3 with his potm card.
I think they slowed down the maxed out 120+ h/9 attribute. Look at the TA4 cards, most of them hover around 100. I think it was their way of saying the maxed out guys are too OP
Oh and that Burnes POTM wasn’t very good once you saw him a few times. Half decent but I always hit him hard. Great pitches, no deception
He was lights out for about a month. His h/9 were high at the time and he had great control. Only way you were piecing him was if people were still using analog pitching. Then better hitter cards came out
-
@hikes83_psn said in I was thinking about this years finest cards and…:
@twisted-_-tea-_psn said in I was thinking about this years finest cards and…:
Just realized we’re likely to get a 99 120+ h/9 Corbin Burnes. We all know how nuts his potm was when it came out. A finest would be crazy. I went like 16-3 with his potm card.
I think they slowed down the maxed out 120+ h/9 attribute. Look at the TA4 cards, most of them hover around 100. I think it was their way of saying the maxed out guys are too OP
Oh and that Burnes POTM wasn’t very good once you saw him a few times. Half decent but I always hit him hard. Great pitches, no deception
All the finest pitchers last year had 120+ H/9. The reason it wasn't a problem is because the no hitter cards didn't exist. The only starting pitchers with over 110 last year were finest, Pearson, a couple topps now and awards scherzer
-
@the_dragon1912 said in I was thinking about this years finest cards and…:
@hikes83_psn said in I was thinking about this years finest cards and…:
@twisted-_-tea-_psn said in I was thinking about this years finest cards and…:
Just realized we’re likely to get a 99 120+ h/9 Corbin Burnes. We all know how nuts his potm was when it came out. A finest would be crazy. I went like 16-3 with his potm card.
I think they slowed down the maxed out 120+ h/9 attribute. Look at the TA4 cards, most of them hover around 100. I think it was their way of saying the maxed out guys are too OP
Oh and that Burnes POTM wasn’t very good once you saw him a few times. Half decent but I always hit him hard. Great pitches, no deception
All the finest pitchers last year had 120+ H/9. The reason it wasn't a problem is because the no hitter cards didn't exist. The only starting pitchers with over 110 last year were finest, Pearson, a couple topps now and awards scherzer
Yeah maybe you’re right but look at that new Valenzuela card. It only has 115 H/9 compared to all others who have 125. It’s a no-no card just like the others
-
@hikes83_psn said in I was thinking about this years finest cards and…:
@the_dragon1912 said in I was thinking about this years finest cards and…:
@hikes83_psn said in I was thinking about this years finest cards and…:
@twisted-_-tea-_psn said in I was thinking about this years finest cards and…:
Just realized we’re likely to get a 99 120+ h/9 Corbin Burnes. We all know how nuts his potm was when it came out. A finest would be crazy. I went like 16-3 with his potm card.
I think they slowed down the maxed out 120+ h/9 attribute. Look at the TA4 cards, most of them hover around 100. I think it was their way of saying the maxed out guys are too OP
Oh and that Burnes POTM wasn’t very good once you saw him a few times. Half decent but I always hit him hard. Great pitches, no deception
All the finest pitchers last year had 120+ H/9. The reason it wasn't a problem is because the no hitter cards didn't exist. The only starting pitchers with over 110 last year were finest, Pearson, a couple topps now and awards scherzer
Yeah maybe you’re right but look at that new Valenzuela card. It only has 115 H/9 compared to all others who have 125. It’s a no-no card just like the others
No hitter cards are still somewhat based on the actual season too though.
1990 Valenzuela had 9.8 H/9, so he has 115 on his card.
1991 Ryan had 5.3 H/9, so he has 125.
2015 Arrieta had 5.9 H/9, so he has 122.The only one that’s pretty off compared to the rest is Verlander, who had 8.1 H/9 in 2007.
-
A admin locked this topic on
