At 889, who gets my WS start?
-
Opener? smdh
And this is why I WONT play online u less I need to complete a certain Daily.
-
@AGENTSxOFxCHAOS said in At 889, who gets my WS start?:
Opener? smdh
And this is why I WONT play online u less I need to complete a certain Daily.
Yeah, you know... like they do in real life sometimes?
NVM, keep playing conquest on rookie
-
I've actually strongly considered going the opener route. Seems to make a ton of sense in order to assess the opponent and their lineup. Hate it when I put a LHP on the mound only to see a lineup full of righties so the opener would seemingly mitigate that.
-
@rosborn27 said in At 889, who gets my WS start?:
I've actually strongly considered going the opener route. Seems to make a ton of sense in order to assess the opponent and their lineup. Hate it when I put a LHP on the mound only to see a lineup full of righties so the opener would seemingly mitigate that.
I use an opener often. Has only bitten me once I believe. By the end of two innings or so I know exactly what my opponent struggles with. Give it a shot!
-
Sale has been my best by far. At 85 percent I would start him and try to go five. Then all hands on deck. Basically it’s game 7 of the ws.
-
@rosborn27 said in At 889, who gets my WS start?:
I've actually strongly considered going the opener route. Seems to make a ton of sense in order to assess the opponent and their lineup. Hate it when I put a LHP on the mound only to see a lineup full of righties so the opener would seemingly mitigate that.
@rosborn27 said in At 889, who gets my WS start?:
I've actually strongly considered going the opener route. Seems to make a ton of sense in order to assess the opponent and their lineup. Hate it when I put a LHP on the mound only to see a lineup full of righties so the opener would seemingly mitigate that.
Your on to something there. Got my brain thinking
-
A admin locked this topic on
