@KommanderNKeef9 said in Monitor Difference:
@STLMattinals_ said in Monitor Difference:
I have a buddy who just got a monitor, and says he is 12-2 on ranked since getting it.
I’ve been around .500 every season. Since getting mine I’m 25-11
Are you sure you have that specific model? The Benq Zowie RL series? If so, it should be there.
@raesONE said in Monitor Difference:
@KommanderNKeef9 said in Monitor Difference:
@STLMattinals_ said in Monitor Difference:
I have a buddy who just got a monitor, and says he is 12-2 on ranked since getting it.
I’ve been around .500 every season. Since getting mine I’m 25-11
Are you sure you have that specific model? The Benq Zowie RL series? If so, it should be there.
I’ll double check! Thank you!
@raesONE said in Monitor Difference:
@CLEtheLAND22 said in Monitor Difference:
@raesONE said in Monitor Difference:
@McGalamaad said in Monitor Difference:
@MaNNYY_RaYY said in Monitor Difference:
Just ordered a BenQ because of this thread. Anything I need to do when I get it besides plug it in & pray I can see the ball better?
Set it to FPS, and that’s about it. All the other settings are really user based.
If you play on a Benq RL2455 or RL2755, I'd recommend using the standard picture mode over FPS.
Why is this my man? I’ve heard FPS before for best input.
It's because there is no difference in response times, but the color saturation makes it easier to see the ball. FPS mode is very oversaturated with a lot of bright backlight due to the Black Equalizer, which is great for first person shooters and spotting people in darker areas, but in MLB The Show it doesn't really do much for you. One might actually make the argument that it's harder to pick up the ball on FPS mode.
At the end of the day, it's all opinions though. If it works for you, stick with it. There is no difference in response time / input lag so it's purely visual and what you're comfortable with.
Yeah I know what you mean. I just always turned the black equalizer all the way down. So all modes are the same input wise? I wasn’t sure so I just used FPS since it seemed right. I was under the assumption that if you increased color vibrancy or etc. it would create some lag or delay. Probably very little but still I stayed away from changing something like that. Always good to hear others input, so thanks man
@CLEtheLAND22 said in Monitor Difference:
@raesONE said in Monitor Difference:
@CLEtheLAND22 said in Monitor Difference:
@raesONE said in Monitor Difference:
@McGalamaad said in Monitor Difference:
@MaNNYY_RaYY said in Monitor Difference:
Just ordered a BenQ because of this thread. Anything I need to do when I get it besides plug it in & pray I can see the ball better?
Set it to FPS, and that’s about it. All the other settings are really user based.
If you play on a Benq RL2455 or RL2755, I'd recommend using the standard picture mode over FPS.
Why is this my man? I’ve heard FPS before for best input.
It's because there is no difference in response times, but the color saturation makes it easier to see the ball. FPS mode is very oversaturated with a lot of bright backlight due to the Black Equalizer, which is great for first person shooters and spotting people in darker areas, but in MLB The Show it doesn't really do much for you. One might actually make the argument that it's harder to pick up the ball on FPS mode.
At the end of the day, it's all opinions though. If it works for you, stick with it. There is no difference in response time / input lag so it's purely visual and what you're comfortable with.
Yeah I know what you mean. I just always turned the black equalizer all the way down. So all modes are the same input wise? I wasn’t sure so I just used FPS since it seemed right. I was under the assumption that if you increased color vibrancy or etc. it would create some lag or delay. Probably very little but still I stayed away from changing something like that. Always good to hear others input, so thanks man
There are people on YouTube for example who have suggested these things with no scientific evidence whatsoever to prove their claims. Rtings, DisplayLag and various other respected hardware reviewers have performed tests with a Leo Bodnar input lag measuring device and they all concluded that for these models it does not change a thing when it comes to input lag.
@KommanderNKeef9 said in Monitor Difference:
@STLMattinals_ said in Monitor Difference:
I have a buddy who just got a monitor, and says he is 12-2 on ranked since getting it.
I’ve been around .500 every season. Since getting mine I’m 25-11
I was just a hair over .500 last year, sub .500 this year. Monitor will be here Monday. LOL