Last 3 Diamonds!!!
-
Out of the many hundreds of packs I've opened in the last month, I have gotten 3 diamonds, 1 sponsorship, 1 banner and 1 icon!!! Are you serious SDS. Can't wait to see what new useless garbage "collectables" you bring out next year to make your horrible pack odds even worse!
-
ok, so here's an idea: If you want diamonds, buy them off the market. If you want to gamble, buy packs.
If you don't like the posted casino odds, don't play the game.
This isn't rocket science .
-
Agreed....I bought Acuna, freeman, Verlander in the first few weeks.
.....pull odds are too crazy and just chance.....I just save up stubs and buy the diamonds I like. Sold Carter bought Murray, likely same with 4th inning -
@lucas8181 said in Last 3 Diamonds!!!:
ok, so here's an idea: If you want diamonds, buy them off the market. If you want to gamble, buy packs.
If you don't like the posted casino odds, don't play the game.
This isn't rocket science .
Firstly I have not spent any money on the game. I am purely talking about packs I received from doing missions and other game play.
Every once in a while i will but a 10 pack bundle or something just for the hell of it with stubs earned.
My point is that they keep putting in junk items or as they call them "collectables" that are not necessary and are including them in the already bad pack odds
-
If you read my post you have, edited it
-
I've probably opened fewer than a hundred packs since the beginning of the game cycle, and I've pulled like five or six diamonds. Posting this in the hope that some of my good luck rubs off on you guys lol.
-
@olivegarden2 said in Last 3 Diamonds!!!:
Guess what buddy, I don’t have a diamond all year. 250+ standards with nothing, 10+ balling and 10+ headliners, nothing. Packs are a scam. Enjoy watching the content creators pull diamonds while you don’t buy a single pack. SDS was trying to get me into buying packs, stopped spending my money and just played the game and got the players I wanted.
SDS deleted a post I had with a very credible article where studios will increase the pack/loot box chances of a better pull for influencers and streamers. Seems to be common knowledge around the gaming industry apparently.
-
@sandule said in Last 3 Diamonds!!!:
@lucas8181 said in Last 3 Diamonds!!!:
ok, so here's an idea: If you want diamonds, buy them off the market. If you want to gamble, buy packs.
If you don't like the posted casino odds, don't play the game.
This isn't rocket science .
Firstly I have not spent any money on the game. I am purely talking about packs I received from doing missions and other game play.
Every once in a while i will but a 10 pack bundle or something just for the hell of it with stubs earned.
My point is that they keep putting in junk items or as they call them "collectables" that are not necessary and are including them in the already bad pack odds
You mean you DONT use the useless icons and nameplates they litter us with in packs??? Shocked I tell ya
-
I buy single packs every so often in hopes of pulling a higher end diamond, but I don't get upset anymore as the odds are so terrible. I'm learning the flipping aspect and when I get a reward I don't want I sell for stubs.
I have some stuff on the market now that if I sold today, I make about 165K. I'll take that and get most of my golds collected and then try and flip to make more profit. -
@DoIHearBossMusic said in Last 3 Diamonds!!!:
@olivegarden2 said in Last 3 Diamonds!!!:
Guess what buddy, I don’t have a diamond all year. 250+ standards with nothing, 10+ balling and 10+ headliners, nothing. Packs are a scam. Enjoy watching the content creators pull diamonds while you don’t buy a single pack. SDS was trying to get me into buying packs, stopped spending my money and just played the game and got the players I wanted.
SDS deleted a post I had with a very credible article where studios will increase the pack/loot box chances of a better pull for influencers and streamers. Seems to be common knowledge around the gaming industry apparently.
They most likely deleted the post because you said anyone who didn't agree with you was a shill, might want to try presenting your argument in a non-aggressive way.
and once again, the article you linked said the interviewee only heard of one studio who did that, so using the word "studios" doesn't work, you mean studio.
-
Packs have been great to me this year.
-
A admin locked this topic on
