Maybe Im missing something with events. I am terrible at these, I have zero success, can't get many more than 5 wins and feel it's just a waste of time. I see some teams loaded with all diamonds and that makes no sense. Plus the time frame for 50+ wins seems unrealistic as I can't dedicate that much time.
Im just wondering how any of this is possible. Obviously it is, people do it, but I can't figure it out.
5 wins per entry?
@stewart1465 said in I Hate Events:
5 wins per entry?
Yes, I constantly run into awesome teams, Im not great at all, I don't play many games online for this reason. I know I need to get better, but my actual point is that if you don't dedicate your play to events only and only can play for a small amount of time per day, how is it possible to get the max amount of wins to even make it worthwhile.
I too have to ration my playing time, but 5 win average per entry puts you at 40-16 when you get Murray, that’s pretty good. This event has made duration vs cumulative wins much more obtainable. It will continue to get easier. I admit, sometimes I get so caught up in grinding MTO and Showdowns to keep up with the TA awards, I sacrifice online play.
Yeah, maybe I'll try to dedicate more time versus grinding moments, etc. My initial thought process was 3 wins per day would put me right there, but not being very good and having to play significantly better teams made that a challenge. My best run was 3 straight wins and I figured it would be easier than I thought, but I haven't won a game in forever. Keep trying I guess, only way to get better, but very frustrating most of the time.
So many people quit out if you score early, I was to 60 before this last 2 version, but I really only played events and ended up prestiging chipper and mantle there. If it wasn’t for prestige incentive I would not have played that much , and stopped at Eddie (who is great btw)