Helpful glossary of terms for the forum
-
This post is deleted!
-
@WiryHooligan22 said in Helpful glossary of terms for the forum:
Seems like he’s the one who outwitted you, just going off your response it seems apparent you don’t have anything worthwhile to say.
Imagine that...the even dimmer coming to the defense of the dim.
I’d gladly have a conversation with you if you can refrain from using insults in every one of your comments. Can you do that?
-
@C_ypress_H_ill said in Helpful glossary of terms for the forum:
@WiryHooligan22 said in Helpful glossary of terms for the forum:
Seems like he’s the one who outwitted you, just going off your response it seems apparent you don’t have anything worthwhile to say.
Imagine that...the even dimmer coming to the defense of the dim.
I’d gladly have a conversation with you if you can refrain from using insults in every one of your comments. Can you do that?
I absolutely can do that. But what makes you think I care at all about having a conversation with you?
-
@WiryHooligan22 said in Helpful glossary of terms for the forum:
Stats - Misnomer for player attributes. “Check out his stats, he’s got 115 vision!”
Glitch - Name incorrectly given to a good player. “Mike Trout is a glitch! Who knew a 95 OVR card could be so good?”
Cheat Code - Similar to glitch. Used when people are surprised that a player excels at something they are good at. “Joey Gallo is a cheat code...who could’ve seen a bunch of homers coming with that 100+ power?”
Good/Good - The only PCI placement outside of Perfect/Perfect that warrants a base hit.
Perfect/Perfect - Home run every time.
Moments - Exercises created to cause misery on a personal level. They are self aware and understand weaknesses.
Comeback Logic - Poor attempt to deflect responsibility for giving up a lead in the late innings.
Broken - The state of MLB The Show after a game in which a player swings at 85% of pitches in the dirt and loses to their opponent.
This is great! Thanks for the good laugh Hooligan!
-
@WiryHooligan22 said in Helpful glossary of terms for the forum:
@C_ypress_H_ill said in Helpful glossary of terms for the forum:
@WiryHooligan22 said in Helpful glossary of terms for the forum:
Seems like he’s the one who outwitted you, just going off your response it seems apparent you don’t have anything worthwhile to say.
Imagine that...the even dimmer coming to the defense of the dim.
I’d gladly have a conversation with you if you can refrain from using insults in every one of your comments. Can you do that?
I absolutely can do that. But what makes you think I care at all about having a conversation with you?
Because you keep talking to me. Walk away if your done.
-
@C_ypress_H_ill said in Helpful glossary of terms for the forum:
@WiryHooligan22 said in Helpful glossary of terms for the forum:
@C_ypress_H_ill said in Helpful glossary of terms for the forum:
@WiryHooligan22 said in Helpful glossary of terms for the forum:
Seems like he’s the one who outwitted you, just going off your response it seems apparent you don’t have anything worthwhile to say.
Imagine that...the even dimmer coming to the defense of the dim.
I’d gladly have a conversation with you if you can refrain from using insults in every one of your comments. Can you do that?
I absolutely can do that. But what makes you think I care at all about having a conversation with you?
Because you keep talking to me. Walk away if your done.
Walk away? It’s my thread. I certainly won’t allow it to be bogarted by the likes of you.
-
@notoriousHEB said in Helpful glossary of terms for the forum:
Haha hilarious good job.
I will say comeback logic is real, vs CPU at least. Do a showdown and skip to final 0-15, everything drops for a hit and the computer makes errors and manhandles lots of balls. As soon as you get within 3 or 4, even with the pitcher having no confidence left all of a sudden well hit balls are snagged and diving plays made. It's eye opening. And really not a bad way to attack showdowns just skip to the end because they let you catch up and kill the confidence meter in the process.
@notoriousHEB interesting. Didn’t know this. About what % can you pull off the 0-15 win?
-
@bonion said in Helpful glossary of terms for the forum:
@notoriousHEB said in Helpful glossary of terms for the forum:
Haha hilarious good job.
I will say comeback logic is real, vs CPU at least. Do a showdown and skip to final 0-15, everything drops for a hit and the computer makes errors and manhandles lots of balls. As soon as you get within 3 or 4, even with the pitcher having no confidence left all of a sudden well hit balls are snagged and diving plays made. It's eye opening. And really not a bad way to attack showdowns just skip to the end because they let you catch up and kill the confidence meter in the process.
@notoriousHEB interesting. Didn’t know this. About what % can you pull off the 0-15 win?
Well first off I'm terrible at the Stage 1 division showdowns. I've yet to complete one successfully. I've done each of the inning showdowns and starter though. I've skipped to the final 3 times for AL East vs Cole, finished tied 15-15, L 12-15, and L 11-15... I know a better player that tried it who knocks down showdowns alot, he won the AL West 1st try.
So for me, i came the closest i ever did. Other guy 1 for 1.
Give it a go, you'll be shocked at the amount of hits that fall for you and watch the CPU make errors which never happens in those.
-
@notoriousHEB said in Helpful glossary of terms for the forum:
@bonion said in Helpful glossary of terms for the forum:
@notoriousHEB said in Helpful glossary of terms for the forum:
Haha hilarious good job.
I will say comeback logic is real, vs CPU at least. Do a showdown and skip to final 0-15, everything drops for a hit and the computer makes errors and manhandles lots of balls. As soon as you get within 3 or 4, even with the pitcher having no confidence left all of a sudden well hit balls are snagged and diving plays made. It's eye opening. And really not a bad way to attack showdowns just skip to the end because they let you catch up and kill the confidence meter in the process.
@notoriousHEB interesting. Didn’t know this. About what % can you pull off the 0-15 win?
Well first off I'm terrible at the Stage 1 division showdowns. I've yet to complete one successfully. I've done each of the inning showdowns and starter though. I've skipped to the final 3 times for AL East vs Cole, finished tied 15-15, L 12-15, and L 11-15... I know a better player that tried it who knocks down showdowns alot, he won the AL West 1st try.
So for me, i came the closest i ever did. Other guy 1 for 1.
Give it a go, you'll be shocked at the amount of hits that fall for you and watch the CPU make errors which never happens in those.
So...what good is doing is this if you don’t win?
-
@WiryHooligan22 said in Helpful glossary of terms for the forum:
@notoriousHEB said in Helpful glossary of terms for the forum:
@bonion said in Helpful glossary of terms for the forum:
@notoriousHEB said in Helpful glossary of terms for the forum:
Haha hilarious good job.
I will say comeback logic is real, vs CPU at least. Do a showdown and skip to final 0-15, everything drops for a hit and the computer makes errors and manhandles lots of balls. As soon as you get within 3 or 4, even with the pitcher having no confidence left all of a sudden well hit balls are snagged and diving plays made. It's eye opening. And really not a bad way to attack showdowns just skip to the end because they let you catch up and kill the confidence meter in the process.
@notoriousHEB interesting. Didn’t know this. About what % can you pull off the 0-15 win?
Well first off I'm terrible at the Stage 1 division showdowns. I've yet to complete one successfully. I've done each of the inning showdowns and starter though. I've skipped to the final 3 times for AL East vs Cole, finished tied 15-15, L 12-15, and L 11-15... I know a better player that tried it who knocks down showdowns alot, he won the AL West 1st try.
So for me, i came the closest i ever did. Other guy 1 for 1.
Give it a go, you'll be shocked at the amount of hits that fall for you and watch the CPU make errors which never happens in those.
So...what good is doing is this if you don’t win?
Well my bud did win. And i came closest i ever had.
Who pissed in your Cheerios?
-
@notoriousHEB said in Helpful glossary of terms for the forum:
@WiryHooligan22 said in Helpful glossary of terms for the forum:
@notoriousHEB said in Helpful glossary of terms for the forum:
@bonion said in Helpful glossary of terms for the forum:
@notoriousHEB said in Helpful glossary of terms for the forum:
Haha hilarious good job.
I will say comeback logic is real, vs CPU at least. Do a showdown and skip to final 0-15, everything drops for a hit and the computer makes errors and manhandles lots of balls. As soon as you get within 3 or 4, even with the pitcher having no confidence left all of a sudden well hit balls are snagged and diving plays made. It's eye opening. And really not a bad way to attack showdowns just skip to the end because they let you catch up and kill the confidence meter in the process.
@notoriousHEB interesting. Didn’t know this. About what % can you pull off the 0-15 win?
Well first off I'm terrible at the Stage 1 division showdowns. I've yet to complete one successfully. I've done each of the inning showdowns and starter though. I've skipped to the final 3 times for AL East vs Cole, finished tied 15-15, L 12-15, and L 11-15... I know a better player that tried it who knocks down showdowns alot, he won the AL West 1st try.
So for me, i came the closest i ever did. Other guy 1 for 1.
Give it a go, you'll be shocked at the amount of hits that fall for you and watch the CPU make errors which never happens in those.
So...what good is doing is this if you don’t win?
Well my bud did win. And i came closest i ever had.
Who pissed in your Cheerios?
I'm not being pissy. I'm just saying it doesn't make sense. Also, I'm not talking about your bud. I'm talking about you. That'd be 3K stubs on 3 attempts that you put zero effort into gaining any sort of advantage for yourself. Then you're relying on what you call "Comeback logic," which apparently works to allow you to get close...then...turns on you?
-
@WiryHooligan22 said in Helpful glossary of terms for the forum:
@notoriousHEB said in Helpful glossary of terms for the forum:
@WiryHooligan22 said in Helpful glossary of terms for the forum:
@notoriousHEB said in Helpful glossary of terms for the forum:
@bonion said in Helpful glossary of terms for the forum:
@notoriousHEB said in Helpful glossary of terms for the forum:
Haha hilarious good job.
I will say comeback logic is real, vs CPU at least. Do a showdown and skip to final 0-15, everything drops for a hit and the computer makes errors and manhandles lots of balls. As soon as you get within 3 or 4, even with the pitcher having no confidence left all of a sudden well hit balls are snagged and diving plays made. It's eye opening. And really not a bad way to attack showdowns just skip to the end because they let you catch up and kill the confidence meter in the process.
@notoriousHEB interesting. Didn’t know this. About what % can you pull off the 0-15 win?
Well first off I'm terrible at the Stage 1 division showdowns. I've yet to complete one successfully. I've done each of the inning showdowns and starter though. I've skipped to the final 3 times for AL East vs Cole, finished tied 15-15, L 12-15, and L 11-15... I know a better player that tried it who knocks down showdowns alot, he won the AL West 1st try.
So for me, i came the closest i ever did. Other guy 1 for 1.
Give it a go, you'll be shocked at the amount of hits that fall for you and watch the CPU make errors which never happens in those.
So...what good is doing is this if you don’t win?
Well my bud did win. And i came closest i ever had.
Who pissed in your Cheerios?
I'm not being pissy. I'm just saying it doesn't make sense. Also, I'm not talking about your bud. I'm talking about you. That'd be 3K stubs on 3 attempts that you put zero effort into gaining any sort of advantage for yourself. Then you're relying on what you call "Comeback logic," which apparently works to allow you to get close...then...turns on you?
Then game more or less allows a high chance of hits falling and a higher chance of the CPU committing errors when you are grossly behind. The CPU booted 3 balls in the first 5 hitters one game, which would never happen in a typical close game. Also, keto in mind those runs are scored with a lineup of silver and bronze players.
If you don't think the game could do this you're kidding yourself because there's literally a perk in showdown for greater chance of computer error. (Which i did not have equipped.)
Don't believe it? Try it and watch what happens.
-
@notoriousHEB said in Helpful glossary of terms for the forum:
@WiryHooligan22 said in Helpful glossary of terms for the forum:
@notoriousHEB said in Helpful glossary of terms for the forum:
@WiryHooligan22 said in Helpful glossary of terms for the forum:
@notoriousHEB said in Helpful glossary of terms for the forum:
@bonion said in Helpful glossary of terms for the forum:
@notoriousHEB said in Helpful glossary of terms for the forum:
Haha hilarious good job.
I will say comeback logic is real, vs CPU at least. Do a showdown and skip to final 0-15, everything drops for a hit and the computer makes errors and manhandles lots of balls. As soon as you get within 3 or 4, even with the pitcher having no confidence left all of a sudden well hit balls are snagged and diving plays made. It's eye opening. And really not a bad way to attack showdowns just skip to the end because they let you catch up and kill the confidence meter in the process.
@notoriousHEB interesting. Didn’t know this. About what % can you pull off the 0-15 win?
Well first off I'm terrible at the Stage 1 division showdowns. I've yet to complete one successfully. I've done each of the inning showdowns and starter though. I've skipped to the final 3 times for AL East vs Cole, finished tied 15-15, L 12-15, and L 11-15... I know a better player that tried it who knocks down showdowns alot, he won the AL West 1st try.
So for me, i came the closest i ever did. Other guy 1 for 1.
Give it a go, you'll be shocked at the amount of hits that fall for you and watch the CPU make errors which never happens in those.
So...what good is doing is this if you don’t win?
Well my bud did win. And i came closest i ever had.
Who pissed in your Cheerios?
I'm not being pissy. I'm just saying it doesn't make sense. Also, I'm not talking about your bud. I'm talking about you. That'd be 3K stubs on 3 attempts that you put zero effort into gaining any sort of advantage for yourself. Then you're relying on what you call "Comeback logic," which apparently works to allow you to get close...then...turns on you?
Then game more or less allows a high chance of hits falling and a higher chance of the CPU committing errors when you are grossly behind. The CPU booted 3 balls in the first 5 hitters one game, which would never happen in a typical close game. Also, keto in mind those runs are scored with a lineup of silver and bronze players.
If you don't think the game could do this you're kidding yourself because there's literally a perk in showdown for greater chance of computer error. (Which i did not have equipped.)
Don't believe it? Try it and watch what happens.
No. I don’t believe your completely anecdotal “evidence.”
-
@WiryHooligan22 said in Helpful glossary of terms for the forum:
@notoriousHEB said in Helpful glossary of terms for the forum:
@WiryHooligan22 said in Helpful glossary of terms for the forum:
@notoriousHEB said in Helpful glossary of terms for the forum:
@WiryHooligan22 said in Helpful glossary of terms for the forum:
@notoriousHEB said in Helpful glossary of terms for the forum:
@bonion said in Helpful glossary of terms for the forum:
@notoriousHEB said in Helpful glossary of terms for the forum:
Haha hilarious good job.
I will say comeback logic is real, vs CPU at least. Do a showdown and skip to final 0-15, everything drops for a hit and the computer makes errors and manhandles lots of balls. As soon as you get within 3 or 4, even with the pitcher having no confidence left all of a sudden well hit balls are snagged and diving plays made. It's eye opening. And really not a bad way to attack showdowns just skip to the end because they let you catch up and kill the confidence meter in the process.
@notoriousHEB interesting. Didn’t know this. About what % can you pull off the 0-15 win?
Well first off I'm terrible at the Stage 1 division showdowns. I've yet to complete one successfully. I've done each of the inning showdowns and starter though. I've skipped to the final 3 times for AL East vs Cole, finished tied 15-15, L 12-15, and L 11-15... I know a better player that tried it who knocks down showdowns alot, he won the AL West 1st try.
So for me, i came the closest i ever did. Other guy 1 for 1.
Give it a go, you'll be shocked at the amount of hits that fall for you and watch the CPU make errors which never happens in those.
So...what good is doing is this if you don’t win?
Well my bud did win. And i came closest i ever had.
Who pissed in your Cheerios?
I'm not being pissy. I'm just saying it doesn't make sense. Also, I'm not talking about your bud. I'm talking about you. That'd be 3K stubs on 3 attempts that you put zero effort into gaining any sort of advantage for yourself. Then you're relying on what you call "Comeback logic," which apparently works to allow you to get close...then...turns on you?
Then game more or less allows a high chance of hits falling and a higher chance of the CPU committing errors when you are grossly behind. The CPU booted 3 balls in the first 5 hitters one game, which would never happen in a typical close game. Also, keto in mind those runs are scored with a lineup of silver and bronze players.
If you don't think the game could do this you're kidding yourself because there's literally a perk in showdown for greater chance of computer error. (Which i did not have equipped.)
Don't believe it? Try it and watch what happens.
No. I don’t believe your completely anecdotal “evidence.”
Never claimed I had evidence, I described my experience.
-
@notoriousHEB said in Helpful glossary of terms for the forum:
@WiryHooligan22 said in Helpful glossary of terms for the forum:
@notoriousHEB said in Helpful glossary of terms for the forum:
@WiryHooligan22 said in Helpful glossary of terms for the forum:
@notoriousHEB said in Helpful glossary of terms for the forum:
@WiryHooligan22 said in Helpful glossary of terms for the forum:
@notoriousHEB said in Helpful glossary of terms for the forum:
@bonion said in Helpful glossary of terms for the forum:
@notoriousHEB said in Helpful glossary of terms for the forum:
Haha hilarious good job.
I will say comeback logic is real, vs CPU at least. Do a showdown and skip to final 0-15, everything drops for a hit and the computer makes errors and manhandles lots of balls. As soon as you get within 3 or 4, even with the pitcher having no confidence left all of a sudden well hit balls are snagged and diving plays made. It's eye opening. And really not a bad way to attack showdowns just skip to the end because they let you catch up and kill the confidence meter in the process.
@notoriousHEB interesting. Didn’t know this. About what % can you pull off the 0-15 win?
Well first off I'm terrible at the Stage 1 division showdowns. I've yet to complete one successfully. I've done each of the inning showdowns and starter though. I've skipped to the final 3 times for AL East vs Cole, finished tied 15-15, L 12-15, and L 11-15... I know a better player that tried it who knocks down showdowns alot, he won the AL West 1st try.
So for me, i came the closest i ever did. Other guy 1 for 1.
Give it a go, you'll be shocked at the amount of hits that fall for you and watch the CPU make errors which never happens in those.
So...what good is doing is this if you don’t win?
Well my bud did win. And i came closest i ever had.
Who pissed in your Cheerios?
I'm not being pissy. I'm just saying it doesn't make sense. Also, I'm not talking about your bud. I'm talking about you. That'd be 3K stubs on 3 attempts that you put zero effort into gaining any sort of advantage for yourself. Then you're relying on what you call "Comeback logic," which apparently works to allow you to get close...then...turns on you?
Then game more or less allows a high chance of hits falling and a higher chance of the CPU committing errors when you are grossly behind. The CPU booted 3 balls in the first 5 hitters one game, which would never happen in a typical close game. Also, keto in mind those runs are scored with a lineup of silver and bronze players.
If you don't think the game could do this you're kidding yourself because there's literally a perk in showdown for greater chance of computer error. (Which i did not have equipped.)
Don't believe it? Try it and watch what happens.
No. I don’t believe your completely anecdotal “evidence.”
Never claimed I had evidence, I described my experience.
Obviously you don’t know what anecdotal evidence is.
-
@WiryHooligan22 said in Helpful glossary of terms for the forum:
@notoriousHEB said in Helpful glossary of terms for the forum:
@WiryHooligan22 said in Helpful glossary of terms for the forum:
@notoriousHEB said in Helpful glossary of terms for the forum:
@WiryHooligan22 said in Helpful glossary of terms for the forum:
@notoriousHEB said in Helpful glossary of terms for the forum:
@WiryHooligan22 said in Helpful glossary of terms for the forum:
@notoriousHEB said in Helpful glossary of terms for the forum:
@bonion said in Helpful glossary of terms for the forum:
@notoriousHEB said in Helpful glossary of terms for the forum:
Haha hilarious good job.
I will say comeback logic is real, vs CPU at least. Do a showdown and skip to final 0-15, everything drops for a hit and the computer makes errors and manhandles lots of balls. As soon as you get within 3 or 4, even with the pitcher having no confidence left all of a sudden well hit balls are snagged and diving plays made. It's eye opening. And really not a bad way to attack showdowns just skip to the end because they let you catch up and kill the confidence meter in the process.
@notoriousHEB interesting. Didn’t know this. About what % can you pull off the 0-15 win?
Well first off I'm terrible at the Stage 1 division showdowns. I've yet to complete one successfully. I've done each of the inning showdowns and starter though. I've skipped to the final 3 times for AL East vs Cole, finished tied 15-15, L 12-15, and L 11-15... I know a better player that tried it who knocks down showdowns alot, he won the AL West 1st try.
So for me, i came the closest i ever did. Other guy 1 for 1.
Give it a go, you'll be shocked at the amount of hits that fall for you and watch the CPU make errors which never happens in those.
So...what good is doing is this if you don’t win?
Well my bud did win. And i came closest i ever had.
Who pissed in your Cheerios?
I'm not being pissy. I'm just saying it doesn't make sense. Also, I'm not talking about your bud. I'm talking about you. That'd be 3K stubs on 3 attempts that you put zero effort into gaining any sort of advantage for yourself. Then you're relying on what you call "Comeback logic," which apparently works to allow you to get close...then...turns on you?
Then game more or less allows a high chance of hits falling and a higher chance of the CPU committing errors when you are grossly behind. The CPU booted 3 balls in the first 5 hitters one game, which would never happen in a typical close game. Also, keto in mind those runs are scored with a lineup of silver and bronze players.
If you don't think the game could do this you're kidding yourself because there's literally a perk in showdown for greater chance of computer error. (Which i did not have equipped.)
Don't believe it? Try it and watch what happens.
No. I don’t believe your completely anecdotal “evidence.”
Never claimed I had evidence, I described my experience.
Obviously you don’t know what anecdotal evidence is.
It's an oxymoron and this isn't a court of law, I'm not submitting any evidence to you I'm describing my experience, call it anecdote if you will. You're the one putting an emphasis on "evidence". I have no evidence, obviously nor would i claim to.
-
@notoriousHEB said in Helpful glossary of terms for the forum:
@WiryHooligan22 said in Helpful glossary of terms for the forum:
@notoriousHEB said in Helpful glossary of terms for the forum:
@WiryHooligan22 said in Helpful glossary of terms for the forum:
@notoriousHEB said in Helpful glossary of terms for the forum:
@WiryHooligan22 said in Helpful glossary of terms for the forum:
@notoriousHEB said in Helpful glossary of terms for the forum:
@WiryHooligan22 said in Helpful glossary of terms for the forum:
@notoriousHEB said in Helpful glossary of terms for the forum:
@bonion said in Helpful glossary of terms for the forum:
@notoriousHEB said in Helpful glossary of terms for the forum:
Haha hilarious good job.
I will say comeback logic is real, vs CPU at least. Do a showdown and skip to final 0-15, everything drops for a hit and the computer makes errors and manhandles lots of balls. As soon as you get within 3 or 4, even with the pitcher having no confidence left all of a sudden well hit balls are snagged and diving plays made. It's eye opening. And really not a bad way to attack showdowns just skip to the end because they let you catch up and kill the confidence meter in the process.
@notoriousHEB interesting. Didn’t know this. About what % can you pull off the 0-15 win?
Well first off I'm terrible at the Stage 1 division showdowns. I've yet to complete one successfully. I've done each of the inning showdowns and starter though. I've skipped to the final 3 times for AL East vs Cole, finished tied 15-15, L 12-15, and L 11-15... I know a better player that tried it who knocks down showdowns alot, he won the AL West 1st try.
So for me, i came the closest i ever did. Other guy 1 for 1.
Give it a go, you'll be shocked at the amount of hits that fall for you and watch the CPU make errors which never happens in those.
So...what good is doing is this if you don’t win?
Well my bud did win. And i came closest i ever had.
Who pissed in your Cheerios?
I'm not being pissy. I'm just saying it doesn't make sense. Also, I'm not talking about your bud. I'm talking about you. That'd be 3K stubs on 3 attempts that you put zero effort into gaining any sort of advantage for yourself. Then you're relying on what you call "Comeback logic," which apparently works to allow you to get close...then...turns on you?
Then game more or less allows a high chance of hits falling and a higher chance of the CPU committing errors when you are grossly behind. The CPU booted 3 balls in the first 5 hitters one game, which would never happen in a typical close game. Also, keto in mind those runs are scored with a lineup of silver and bronze players.
If you don't think the game could do this you're kidding yourself because there's literally a perk in showdown for greater chance of computer error. (Which i did not have equipped.)
Don't believe it? Try it and watch what happens.
No. I don’t believe your completely anecdotal “evidence.”
Never claimed I had evidence, I described my experience.
Obviously you don’t know what anecdotal evidence is.
It's an oxymoron and this isn't a court of law, I'm not submitting any evidence to you I'm describing my experience, call it anecdote if you will. You're the one putting an emphasis on "evidence". I have no evidence, obviously nor would i claim to.
Oh my god...sit down, take an obviously much-needed lesson. Anecdotal evidence is not an oxymoron. anecdotal means that it's based on your personal account or experience. Anecdotal evidence would be what you presented in an attempt to say that skipping to the main boss is good because you almost beat it.
I didn't use quotations for emphasis. I was using quotations as a manner of condescension and sarcasm. I was using the quotations around "evidence" kind of in the way I would say you are "smart."
-
@C_ypress_H_ill said in Helpful glossary of terms for the forum:
@WiryHooligan22 said in Helpful glossary of terms for the forum:
Seems like he’s the one who outwitted you, just going off your response it seems apparent you don’t have anything worthwhile to say.
Imagine that...the even dimmer coming to the defense of the dim.
I’d gladly have a conversation with you if you can refrain from using insults in every one of your comments. Can you do that?
Yeah apparently when I brought it up, I had no arms? And now everyone has down syndrome again. He’s so witty and clever, apparently this is also why he wife likes him so be careful.
-
@ChArTeRBuS said in Helpful glossary of terms for the forum:
@C_ypress_H_ill said in Helpful glossary of terms for the forum:
@WiryHooligan22 said in Helpful glossary of terms for the forum:
Seems like he’s the one who outwitted you, just going off your response it seems apparent you don’t have anything worthwhile to say.
Imagine that...the even dimmer coming to the defense of the dim.
I’d gladly have a conversation with you if you can refrain from using insults in every one of your comments. Can you do that?
Yeah apparently when I brought it up, I had no arms? And now everyone has down syndrome again. He’s so witty and clever, apparently this is also why he wife likes him so be careful.
What are you talking about? I didn’t say you have no arms. I said you were unarmed in a battle of wits, which you’ve now doubly proven.
-
@WiryHooligan22 said in Helpful glossary of terms for the forum:
@notoriousHEB said in Helpful glossary of terms for the forum:
@WiryHooligan22 said in Helpful glossary of terms for the forum:
@notoriousHEB said in Helpful glossary of terms for the forum:
@WiryHooligan22 said in Helpful glossary of terms for the forum:
@notoriousHEB said in Helpful glossary of terms for the forum:
@WiryHooligan22 said in Helpful glossary of terms for the forum:
@notoriousHEB said in Helpful glossary of terms for the forum:
@WiryHooligan22 said in Helpful glossary of terms for the forum:
@notoriousHEB said in Helpful glossary of terms for the forum:
@bonion said in Helpful glossary of terms for the forum:
@notoriousHEB said in Helpful glossary of terms for the forum:
Haha hilarious good job.
I will say comeback logic is real, vs CPU at least. Do a showdown and skip to final 0-15, everything drops for a hit and the computer makes errors and manhandles lots of balls. As soon as you get within 3 or 4, even with the pitcher having no confidence left all of a sudden well hit balls are snagged and diving plays made. It's eye opening. And really not a bad way to attack showdowns just skip to the end because they let you catch up and kill the confidence meter in the process.
@notoriousHEB interesting. Didn’t know this. About what % can you pull off the 0-15 win?
Well first off I'm terrible at the Stage 1 division showdowns. I've yet to complete one successfully. I've done each of the inning showdowns and starter though. I've skipped to the final 3 times for AL East vs Cole, finished tied 15-15, L 12-15, and L 11-15... I know a better player that tried it who knocks down showdowns alot, he won the AL West 1st try.
So for me, i came the closest i ever did. Other guy 1 for 1.
Give it a go, you'll be shocked at the amount of hits that fall for you and watch the CPU make errors which never happens in those.
So...what good is doing is this if you don’t win?
Well my bud did win. And i came closest i ever had.
Who pissed in your Cheerios?
I'm not being pissy. I'm just saying it doesn't make sense. Also, I'm not talking about your bud. I'm talking about you. That'd be 3K stubs on 3 attempts that you put zero effort into gaining any sort of advantage for yourself. Then you're relying on what you call "Comeback logic," which apparently works to allow you to get close...then...turns on you?
Then game more or less allows a high chance of hits falling and a higher chance of the CPU committing errors when you are grossly behind. The CPU booted 3 balls in the first 5 hitters one game, which would never happen in a typical close game. Also, keto in mind those runs are scored with a lineup of silver and bronze players.
If you don't think the game could do this you're kidding yourself because there's literally a perk in showdown for greater chance of computer error. (Which i did not have equipped.)
Don't believe it? Try it and watch what happens.
No. I don’t believe your completely anecdotal “evidence.”
Never claimed I had evidence, I described my experience.
Obviously you don’t know what anecdotal evidence is.
It's an oxymoron and this isn't a court of law, I'm not submitting any evidence to you I'm describing my experience, call it anecdote if you will. You're the one putting an emphasis on "evidence". I have no evidence, obviously nor would i claim to.
Oh my god...sit down, take an obviously much-needed lesson. Anecdotal evidence is not an oxymoron. anecdotal means that it's based on your personal account or experience. Anecdotal evidence would be what you presented in an attempt to say that skipping to the main boss is good because you almost beat it.
I didn't use quotations for emphasis. I was using quotations as a manner of condescension and sarcasm. I was using the quotations around "evidence" kind of in the way I would say you are "smart."
Lmao what a piece of work you are. How miserable.
First off anecdotal evidence is an oxymoron and i do understand what it is, i even said feel free to call my post anecdotal but at no point am i asserting it as evidence and this isn't a court of law it's a message board for people to post and have fun, complain about the game, or in your course be miserable towards everyone. At no point did i claim to have any factual evidence just my opinion and experience, anecdotal if you will.
Here's a quick synopsis from a chap from Oxford with a BA in literature and language, today you learned that anecdotal evidence is an oxymoron.
https://www.quora.com/What-does-anecdotal-evidence-mean-What-are-some-examples
You act like the smartest guy in the room and act like a [censored] towards everyone, but really you just come off as a miserable snob.
You need to get outside and add some enjoyment to your life.
