Diamond quest
-
I personally think this is one of the best modes. Quick missions objectives arnt very hard but rewards are worth the grind. I just wish they would have more lineup centric quests, like certain overall limit, or right handed batters only, ext. they also could just have randomly generated maps that are a bit bigger then what they have now and that earn you packs, doesn’t always need to be when a new program drops and it’s just players from that program. Just think this mode could be so much more than it is. But that’s my humble opinion
-
@domdw99_PSN lineup restrictions are coming; harder to do early in the game.
-
I would love to see more choice into it, specifically let me choose to play more games if I want to. What turns me off from the mode is that its ineffective for pxp. The mini bosses counting for missions is a nice touch though
-
@Teak2112_MLBTS Yeah the fact that you cant really double dip with PXP missions for TA kind of stinks. Of course conquest is not repeateble so PXP grinding is more limited this year.
-
I wish I could agree. I think That this just forces ppl to have to do stuff they don't like. Whether that is moments or Showdowns. and then only rewards the very tip top of players who can already flawless BR for stubs, now they get to grind DQ on GOAT and flood the market with those cards that are the only ones most NMS players can realistically sell.
I think if you got to use previously owned perks (or some subset of them) on new runs to make each subsequent run feel easier...like the rougue-like they billed it as. I would be more sold. But as is I just either waste 45 minutes for a 60% chance. Or waste 15 minutes for a 10% chance. It Just feels so bad, especially with no PXP on top of that.
-
@mubby_33_PSN said in Diamond quest:
@Teak2112_MLBTS Yeah the fact that you cant really double dip with PXP missions for TA kind of stinks. Of course conquest is not repeateble so PXP grinding is more limited this year.
You can play conquest again,there is just no rewards for doing so.
Not wanting to(understandable)is different than can not.
