P 5's In '25
-
@JoeSelser_PSN said in P 5's In '25:
No you don't. It's very easy. A pitcher...you get 500 pxp points for pitching a complete game with 15 ks. On rookies, that easy.
Same with hitting. Whoever you want to see leveled up, bat him 1 thru 3 and you're guaranteed at least 5 at bats with that hitter on rookie at Coors. Now granted...it takes longer for a hitter, but still.
That can all be done on Veteran as well for even more points.
-
@SupremeKai_510_PSN adding any difficulty to game and half the players are going to lose their minds . I can see it now " by time I p5 my player it's useless the new card came out" . They'll accuse sds of purposely adding difficulty so you spend more on new cards . But what are you gonna do ? People are gonna people.
-
The parallel system as it is right now is perfect. No reason to change it except maybe add more levels (I personally wouldn’t, but maybe a P6 would be earned through certain stats, online play, etc).
-
@SupremeKai_510_PSN Isn’t this the way it is this year?
-
@SupremeKai_510_PSN4th that's how it is right now with the P5s
-
@sbchamps17_NSW Pretty sure he is suggesting P1 should be +1, P2 should be another +2 (so +3 total), P3 should be another +3 (so +6 total), etc. P5 would be +15 total (+1, +2, +3, +4, +5). That’d be crazy.
-
@RealPudgyPanda_PSN said in P 5's In '25:
@sbchamps17_NSW Pretty sure he is suggesting P1 should be +1, P2 should be another +2 (so +3 total), P3 should be another +3 (so +6 total), etc. P5 would be +15 total (+1, +2, +3, +4, +5). That’d be crazy.
Oh. Yeah if that’s what he’s suggesting, then, no. That’d be ridiculous.
-
-
-
@dbub_PSN I rather it just to infinite. And have each difficulty have its on pxp.
-
@JoeSelser_PSN infinite power?
