BR Should Be On HOF
-
@skepple15 said in BR Should Be On HOF:
@Vipersneak said in BR Should Be On HOF:
@coastereight said in BR Should Be On HOF:
@Vipersneak said in BR Should Be On HOF:
@ImDFC said in BR Should Be On HOF:
I'm not saying you're wrong. I just can't play HoF online. the PCI is too small for me to use with an analog stick. Kudos to you fellas who can, but I making precise movements is just not something these thumbs were built for. Now if I had some sort of twin stick controller...
What they mean is that they would be able to win easier in BR if it were on HoF. It makes it harder for people with less reaction time. That is all they care about. Same discussion every year and these guys have to same old argument. I personally do not care either way, but them saying the game plays better on HoF just means it plays better for them on HoF. They are not looking out for the community like they want you to believe. They just cant say, "Make BR HoF so that I can win more often." Does not sound as nice. They HATE the fact that they can lose on All Star and that it gives other people with slower reflexes a chance.
So in a game mode where the goal is to go 12-0, you think the lesser players should win?
Also, it's not just because I'll win more. It's legitimately more fun. It's not fun when players with no plate discipline keep fouling off my pitches way out of the zone, and I can't throw a high fastball ever because they regularly get crushed. There are almost no strikeouts on All Star. It's awful.
You are only proving me right. Btw, what is a "lesser player"? How do you personally determine a "lesser player"? Is it just an elite feeling you get, or do you know all the people you play?
I mean... they show records at the beginning of the game lol
They do not. They show RS records. You have no idea how other players do in BR or events.
-
@skepple15 said in BR Should Be On HOF:
@Vipersneak said in BR Should Be On HOF:
@skepple15 said in BR Should Be On HOF:
@Vipersneak said in BR Should Be On HOF:
@ImDFC said in BR Should Be On HOF:
I'm not saying you're wrong. I just can't play HoF online. the PCI is too small for me to use with an analog stick. Kudos to you fellas who can, but I making precise movements is just not something these thumbs were built for. Now if I had some sort of twin stick controller...
What they mean is that they would be able to win easier in BR if it were on HoF. It makes it harder for people with less reaction time. That is all they care about. Same discussion every year and these guys have to same old argument. I personally do not care either way, but them saying the game plays better on HoF just means it plays better for them on HoF. They are not looking out for the community like they want you to believe. They just cant say, "Make BR HoF so that I can win more often." Does not sound as nice. They HATE the fact that they can lose on All Star and that it gives other people with slower reflexes a chance.
Despite your hate for the premise, a smaller pci makes for less inconsistency in results, hence the “game plays better on hall of fame” comments, if BR is going to give out to give out the best rewards then yes worse players should have less of a chance to win.
Less inconsistency in results? That is the same thing as you losing less often. Just say, "ya, he is right, I would win more".
So just so I’m clear, your argument for the game mode that gives out the best rewards is that there should be more inconsistency in your results? Just want to make sure I’m reading it right
I do not think of it in those terms. Those are your words trying to explain away that you want a higher chance to win.
-
@Vipersneak said in BR Should Be On HOF:
@skepple15 said in BR Should Be On HOF:
@Vipersneak said in BR Should Be On HOF:
@skepple15 said in BR Should Be On HOF:
@Vipersneak said in BR Should Be On HOF:
@ImDFC said in BR Should Be On HOF:
I'm not saying you're wrong. I just can't play HoF online. the PCI is too small for me to use with an analog stick. Kudos to you fellas who can, but I making precise movements is just not something these thumbs were built for. Now if I had some sort of twin stick controller...
What they mean is that they would be able to win easier in BR if it were on HoF. It makes it harder for people with less reaction time. That is all they care about. Same discussion every year and these guys have to same old argument. I personally do not care either way, but them saying the game plays better on HoF just means it plays better for them on HoF. They are not looking out for the community like they want you to believe. They just cant say, "Make BR HoF so that I can win more often." Does not sound as nice. They HATE the fact that they can lose on All Star and that it gives other people with slower reflexes a chance.
Despite your hate for the premise, a smaller pci makes for less inconsistency in results, hence the “game plays better on hall of fame” comments, if BR is going to give out to give out the best rewards then yes worse players should have less of a chance to win.
Less inconsistency in results? That is the same thing as you losing less often. Just say, "ya, he is right, I would win more".
So just so I’m clear, your argument for the game mode that gives out the best rewards is that there should be more inconsistency in your results? Just want to make sure I’m reading it right
I do not think of it in those terms. Those are your words trying to explain away that you want a higher chance to win.
But that’s what you’re saying though right? You don’t like the idea of BR being on hall of fame because you feel it puts you at a disadvantage because you can’t play the game on hall of fame as well as you can on all star?
-
Come on! Just admit it. You want a greater chance to win in BR. It is so obvious. You are almost there and just will not say the words.
-
@Vipersneak said in BR Should Be On HOF:
@skepple15 said in BR Should Be On HOF:
@Vipersneak said in BR Should Be On HOF:
@skepple15 said in BR Should Be On HOF:
@Vipersneak said in BR Should Be On HOF:
@ImDFC said in BR Should Be On HOF:
I'm not saying you're wrong. I just can't play HoF online. the PCI is too small for me to use with an analog stick. Kudos to you fellas who can, but I making precise movements is just not something these thumbs were built for. Now if I had some sort of twin stick controller...
What they mean is that they would be able to win easier in BR if it were on HoF. It makes it harder for people with less reaction time. That is all they care about. Same discussion every year and these guys have to same old argument. I personally do not care either way, but them saying the game plays better on HoF just means it plays better for them on HoF. They are not looking out for the community like they want you to believe. They just cant say, "Make BR HoF so that I can win more often." Does not sound as nice. They HATE the fact that they can lose on All Star and that it gives other people with slower reflexes a chance.
Despite your hate for the premise, a smaller pci makes for less inconsistency in results, hence the “game plays better on hall of fame” comments, if BR is going to give out to give out the best rewards then yes worse players should have less of a chance to win.
Less inconsistency in results? That is the same thing as you losing less often. Just say, "ya, he is right, I would win more".
So just so I’m clear, your argument for the game mode that gives out the best rewards is that there should be more inconsistency in your results? Just want to make sure I’m reading it right
I do not think of it in those terms. Those are your words trying to explain away that you want a higher chance to win.
Don't you want it on All Star so you or others have a higher chance to win?
Also, I've explained it's not just that. It plays better because there is less randomness, high fastballs are useable, and strikeouts happen at more realistic rates.
-
@coastereight said in BR Should Be On HOF:
@Vipersneak said in BR Should Be On HOF:
@skepple15 said in BR Should Be On HOF:
@Vipersneak said in BR Should Be On HOF:
@skepple15 said in BR Should Be On HOF:
@Vipersneak said in BR Should Be On HOF:
@ImDFC said in BR Should Be On HOF:
I'm not saying you're wrong. I just can't play HoF online. the PCI is too small for me to use with an analog stick. Kudos to you fellas who can, but I making precise movements is just not something these thumbs were built for. Now if I had some sort of twin stick controller...
What they mean is that they would be able to win easier in BR if it were on HoF. It makes it harder for people with less reaction time. That is all they care about. Same discussion every year and these guys have to same old argument. I personally do not care either way, but them saying the game plays better on HoF just means it plays better for them on HoF. They are not looking out for the community like they want you to believe. They just cant say, "Make BR HoF so that I can win more often." Does not sound as nice. They HATE the fact that they can lose on All Star and that it gives other people with slower reflexes a chance.
Despite your hate for the premise, a smaller pci makes for less inconsistency in results, hence the “game plays better on hall of fame” comments, if BR is going to give out to give out the best rewards then yes worse players should have less of a chance to win.
Less inconsistency in results? That is the same thing as you losing less often. Just say, "ya, he is right, I would win more".
So just so I’m clear, your argument for the game mode that gives out the best rewards is that there should be more inconsistency in your results? Just want to make sure I’m reading it right
I do not think of it in those terms. Those are your words trying to explain away that you want a higher chance to win.
Don't you want it on All Star so you or others have a higher chance to win?
Also, I've explained it's not just that. It plays better because there is less randomness, high fastballs are useable, and strikeouts happen at more realistic rates.
I’ve always found his way of thinking to be funny, based on his comments I’ve always made the assumption that he was an older guy, but for an older guy his comments never seem to make sense, they’re the generation that’s always pounding home “kids are so soft with their participation trophy upbringing” but then he’s always banging the drum for participation trophies here and maybe I’m wrong on him being an older guy but i don’t think I am.
-
@skepple15 said in BR Should Be On HOF:
@Vipersneak said in BR Should Be On HOF:
@skepple15 said in BR Should Be On HOF:
@Vipersneak said in BR Should Be On HOF:
@skepple15 said in BR Should Be On HOF:
@Vipersneak said in BR Should Be On HOF:
@ImDFC said in BR Should Be On HOF:
I'm not saying you're wrong. I just can't play HoF online. the PCI is too small for me to use with an analog stick. Kudos to you fellas who can, but I making precise movements is just not something these thumbs were built for. Now if I had some sort of twin stick controller...
What they mean is that they would be able to win easier in BR if it were on HoF. It makes it harder for people with less reaction time. That is all they care about. Same discussion every year and these guys have to same old argument. I personally do not care either way, but them saying the game plays better on HoF just means it plays better for them on HoF. They are not looking out for the community like they want you to believe. They just cant say, "Make BR HoF so that I can win more often." Does not sound as nice. They HATE the fact that they can lose on All Star and that it gives other people with slower reflexes a chance.
Despite your hate for the premise, a smaller pci makes for less inconsistency in results, hence the “game plays better on hall of fame” comments, if BR is going to give out to give out the best rewards then yes worse players should have less of a chance to win.
Less inconsistency in results? That is the same thing as you losing less often. Just say, "ya, he is right, I would win more".
So just so I’m clear, your argument for the game mode that gives out the best rewards is that there should be more inconsistency in your results? Just want to make sure I’m reading it right
I do not think of it in those terms. Those are your words trying to explain away that you want a higher chance to win.
But that’s what you’re saying though right? You don’t like the idea of BR being on hall of fame because you feel it puts you at a disadvantage because you can’t play the game on hall of fame as well as you can on all star?
That is not my argument at all. I do not play BR so I do not really care what the difficulty is. I am just pointing out what it is you want so that others who do play BR do not fall for your BS about how it would even be better for them.
-
@Vipersneak said in BR Should Be On HOF:
@skepple15 said in BR Should Be On HOF:
@Vipersneak said in BR Should Be On HOF:
@skepple15 said in BR Should Be On HOF:
@Vipersneak said in BR Should Be On HOF:
@skepple15 said in BR Should Be On HOF:
@Vipersneak said in BR Should Be On HOF:
@ImDFC said in BR Should Be On HOF:
I'm not saying you're wrong. I just can't play HoF online. the PCI is too small for me to use with an analog stick. Kudos to you fellas who can, but I making precise movements is just not something these thumbs were built for. Now if I had some sort of twin stick controller...
What they mean is that they would be able to win easier in BR if it were on HoF. It makes it harder for people with less reaction time. That is all they care about. Same discussion every year and these guys have to same old argument. I personally do not care either way, but them saying the game plays better on HoF just means it plays better for them on HoF. They are not looking out for the community like they want you to believe. They just cant say, "Make BR HoF so that I can win more often." Does not sound as nice. They HATE the fact that they can lose on All Star and that it gives other people with slower reflexes a chance.
Despite your hate for the premise, a smaller pci makes for less inconsistency in results, hence the “game plays better on hall of fame” comments, if BR is going to give out to give out the best rewards then yes worse players should have less of a chance to win.
Less inconsistency in results? That is the same thing as you losing less often. Just say, "ya, he is right, I would win more".
So just so I’m clear, your argument for the game mode that gives out the best rewards is that there should be more inconsistency in your results? Just want to make sure I’m reading it right
I do not think of it in those terms. Those are your words trying to explain away that you want a higher chance to win.
But that’s what you’re saying though right? You don’t like the idea of BR being on hall of fame because you feel it puts you at a disadvantage because you can’t play the game on hall of fame as well as you can on all star?
That is not my argument at all. I do not play BR so I do not really care what the difficulty is. I am just pointing out what it is you want so that others who do play BR do not fall for your BS about how it would even be better for them.
I mean.. someone on this thread literally said it was their first day playing on hall of fame and they loved it...
-
@skepple15 said in BR Should Be On HOF:
@coastereight said in BR Should Be On HOF:
@Vipersneak said in BR Should Be On HOF:
@skepple15 said in BR Should Be On HOF:
@Vipersneak said in BR Should Be On HOF:
@skepple15 said in BR Should Be On HOF:
@Vipersneak said in BR Should Be On HOF:
@ImDFC said in BR Should Be On HOF:
I'm not saying you're wrong. I just can't play HoF online. the PCI is too small for me to use with an analog stick. Kudos to you fellas who can, but I making precise movements is just not something these thumbs were built for. Now if I had some sort of twin stick controller...
What they mean is that they would be able to win easier in BR if it were on HoF. It makes it harder for people with less reaction time. That is all they care about. Same discussion every year and these guys have to same old argument. I personally do not care either way, but them saying the game plays better on HoF just means it plays better for them on HoF. They are not looking out for the community like they want you to believe. They just cant say, "Make BR HoF so that I can win more often." Does not sound as nice. They HATE the fact that they can lose on All Star and that it gives other people with slower reflexes a chance.
Despite your hate for the premise, a smaller pci makes for less inconsistency in results, hence the “game plays better on hall of fame” comments, if BR is going to give out to give out the best rewards then yes worse players should have less of a chance to win.
Less inconsistency in results? That is the same thing as you losing less often. Just say, "ya, he is right, I would win more".
So just so I’m clear, your argument for the game mode that gives out the best rewards is that there should be more inconsistency in your results? Just want to make sure I’m reading it right
I do not think of it in those terms. Those are your words trying to explain away that you want a higher chance to win.
Don't you want it on All Star so you or others have a higher chance to win?
Also, I've explained it's not just that. It plays better because there is less randomness, high fastballs are useable, and strikeouts happen at more realistic rates.
I’ve always found his way of thinking to be funny, based on his comments I’ve always made the assumption that he was an older guy, but for an older guy his comments never seem to make sense, they’re the generation that’s always pounding home “kids are so soft with their participation trophy upbringing” but then he’s always banging the drum for participation trophies here and maybe I’m wrong on him being an older guy but i don’t think I am.
Personal attacks are not allowed on these forums.
-
-
I also suggest them making hof a season early in RS in WC
-
@ImDFC said in BR Should Be On HOF:
Also, why stop at Hall of Fame? Legend will provide the best result for the best players, and all inferior will lose almost every time. Seems like the superior option for skilled players of these games
I’d be cool with that
-
@InTh3iLLCity41 said in BR Should Be On HOF:
I also suggest them making hof a season early in RS in WC
100% agreed
-
@ImDFC said in BR Should Be On HOF:
Also, why stop at Hall of Fame? Legend will provide the best result for the best players, and all inferior will lose almost every time. Seems like the superior option for skilled players of these games
There you go. But see, they want the "lesser players" to play so that they can win. On Legend, "lesser players" will not even play. Then they have only each other to play and it becomes fair again.
-
@Vipersneak said in BR Should Be On HOF:
@skepple15 said in BR Should Be On HOF:
@coastereight said in BR Should Be On HOF:
@Vipersneak said in BR Should Be On HOF:
@skepple15 said in BR Should Be On HOF:
@Vipersneak said in BR Should Be On HOF:
@skepple15 said in BR Should Be On HOF:
@Vipersneak said in BR Should Be On HOF:
@ImDFC said in BR Should Be On HOF:
I'm not saying you're wrong. I just can't play HoF online. the PCI is too small for me to use with an analog stick. Kudos to you fellas who can, but I making precise movements is just not something these thumbs were built for. Now if I had some sort of twin stick controller...
What they mean is that they would be able to win easier in BR if it were on HoF. It makes it harder for people with less reaction time. That is all they care about. Same discussion every year and these guys have to same old argument. I personally do not care either way, but them saying the game plays better on HoF just means it plays better for them on HoF. They are not looking out for the community like they want you to believe. They just cant say, "Make BR HoF so that I can win more often." Does not sound as nice. They HATE the fact that they can lose on All Star and that it gives other people with slower reflexes a chance.
Despite your hate for the premise, a smaller pci makes for less inconsistency in results, hence the “game plays better on hall of fame” comments, if BR is going to give out to give out the best rewards then yes worse players should have less of a chance to win.
Less inconsistency in results? That is the same thing as you losing less often. Just say, "ya, he is right, I would win more".
So just so I’m clear, your argument for the game mode that gives out the best rewards is that there should be more inconsistency in your results? Just want to make sure I’m reading it right
I do not think of it in those terms. Those are your words trying to explain away that you want a higher chance to win.
Don't you want it on All Star so you or others have a higher chance to win?
Also, I've explained it's not just that. It plays better because there is less randomness, high fastballs are useable, and strikeouts happen at more realistic rates.
I’ve always found his way of thinking to be funny, based on his comments I’ve always made the assumption that he was an older guy, but for an older guy his comments never seem to make sense, they’re the generation that’s always pounding home “kids are so soft with their participation trophy upbringing” but then he’s always banging the drum for participation trophies here and maybe I’m wrong on him being an older guy but i don’t think I am.
Personal attacks are not allowed on these forums.
There is no personal attack there, unless being old is a personal attack which if it is I’d be attacking myself as well
-
@Vipersneak said in BR Should Be On HOF:
@ImDFC said in BR Should Be On HOF:
I'm not saying you're wrong. I just can't play HoF online. the PCI is too small for me to use with an analog stick. Kudos to you fellas who can, but I making precise movements is just not something these thumbs were built for. Now if I had some sort of twin stick controller...
What they mean is that they would be able to win easier in BR if it were on HoF. It makes it harder for people with less reaction time. That is all they care about. Same discussion every year and these guys have to same old argument. I personally do not care either way, but them saying the game plays better on HoF just means it plays better for them on HoF. They are not looking out for the community like they want you to believe. They just cant say, "Make BR HoF so that I can win more often." Does not sound as nice. They HATE the fact that they can lose on All Star and that it gives other people with slower reflexes a chance.
People with slower reflexes shouldn't be rewarded for having slower reflexes. If someone can react a little quicker and more accurately they should be rewarded more.
Just the disclaimer: I will never go 12-0 in BR, I'll be lucky to get 6 wins in BR. -
@skepple15 said in BR Should Be On HOF:
@InTh3iLLCity41 said in BR Should Be On HOF:
I also suggest them making hof a season early in RS in WC
100% agreed
I dont think enough people have experienced and saw that hof plays so much better and fluently than any other difficulty, otherwise i think there would be more in favor of so.
-
@InTh3iLLCity41 said in BR Should Be On HOF:
@skepple15 said in BR Should Be On HOF:
@InTh3iLLCity41 said in BR Should Be On HOF:
I also suggest them making hof a season early in RS in WC
100% agreed
I dont think enough people have experienced and saw that hof plays so much better and fluently than any other difficulty, otherwise i think there would be more in favor of so.
I swear AS divisions in RS are playing on the offline HOF settings, pitch speeds and PCI size seem identical.
-
@foge011 said in BR Should Be On HOF:
@Vipersneak said in BR Should Be On HOF:
@ImDFC said in BR Should Be On HOF:
I'm not saying you're wrong. I just can't play HoF online. the PCI is too small for me to use with an analog stick. Kudos to you fellas who can, but I making precise movements is just not something these thumbs were built for. Now if I had some sort of twin stick controller...
What they mean is that they would be able to win easier in BR if it were on HoF. It makes it harder for people with less reaction time. That is all they care about. Same discussion every year and these guys have to same old argument. I personally do not care either way, but them saying the game plays better on HoF just means it plays better for them on HoF. They are not looking out for the community like they want you to believe. They just cant say, "Make BR HoF so that I can win more often." Does not sound as nice. They HATE the fact that they can lose on All Star and that it gives other people with slower reflexes a chance.
People with slower reflexes shouldn't be rewarded for having slower reflexes. If someone can react a little quicker and more accurately they should be rewarded more.
That is true. That is not my argument. My argument is them trying to convince people with lesser reflexes that HoF is better for them because it plays better. That is not the reason for their argument. It is to win more often with less challenge for themselves. So I agree that they should make it Legend so there is no one playing who is not a "greater player".
-
@JEEZY-E said in BR Should Be On HOF:
@InTh3iLLCity41 said in BR Should Be On HOF:
@skepple15 said in BR Should Be On HOF:
@InTh3iLLCity41 said in BR Should Be On HOF:
I also suggest them making hof a season early in RS in WC
100% agreed
I dont think enough people have experienced and saw that hof plays so much better and fluently than any other difficulty, otherwise i think there would be more in favor of so.
I swear AS divisions in RS are playing on the offline HOF settings, pitch speeds and PCI size seem identical.
One of the issues last year was that AS was so random and wild. The pcis were huge and it was pretty much just toss up games to who can hit more homeruns
