Two Questions
-
@dap1234567890 said in Two Questions:
@sauciestburrito_psn said in Two Questions:
@dap1234567890 said in Two Questions:
@dewrock_psn said in Two Questions:
@dap1234567890 said in Two Questions:
@dewrock_psn said in Two Questions:
@dap1234567890 said in Two Questions:
@dewrock_psn said in Two Questions:
@dap1234567890 said in Two Questions:
@ballneverlie_xbl said in Two Questions:
Well comparing HOF and soon to be HOFers to players that havent done jack is a big difference.
Its a video game so whatever floats your boat. More content the better
There is a difference in what they have accomplished in real life, but those cards still have a better chance of becoming reality than those lineups that the people who are complaining they are unrealistic!
I don't even understand the argument that you're trying to make. Why do they have a better chance of becoming reality than the lineups with HOFers or potential HOFers? What ever that means anyway.
Go back to the original post!
Been there...
Still doesn't make sense.
If you can't figure it out, you are helpless!
Well that's a creative way to have a discussion.
Why don't you enlighten me and explain it to me like I'm 5?
How is a lineup of future stars more realistic than a lineup of HOFers? I honestly do not understand the argument you're making, in particular because you haven't actually made one.
And I don't have any issues with future star cards...
With many of these legends in these lineups are dead, so there is definitely a zero chance of having these lineups become realistic, however there is still (however slight) a chance that these players in the FS cards become worthy at some point of those stats. Slight chance is greater than zero chance.
Bruh not a single person cares how realistic a lineup is in this game. You clearly don't understand the argument here
That is my point, they get all upset about how unreal the FS cards are, but not how unreal their lineups are! Which pretty much defeats their own argument of why they don't want to see FS cards!
You're still missing the point. FS get hate because they are given juiced up cards they haven't earned that are better than literal hall of famers. Legends cards are based off of actual stats, while FS are based off of projections. That's the argument. Has nothing to do with realism of lineups
-
@sauciestburrito_psn said in Two Questions:
@dap1234567890 said in Two Questions:
@sauciestburrito_psn said in Two Questions:
@dap1234567890 said in Two Questions:
@dewrock_psn said in Two Questions:
@dap1234567890 said in Two Questions:
@dewrock_psn said in Two Questions:
@dap1234567890 said in Two Questions:
@dewrock_psn said in Two Questions:
@dap1234567890 said in Two Questions:
@ballneverlie_xbl said in Two Questions:
Well comparing HOF and soon to be HOFers to players that havent done jack is a big difference.
Its a video game so whatever floats your boat. More content the better
There is a difference in what they have accomplished in real life, but those cards still have a better chance of becoming reality than those lineups that the people who are complaining they are unrealistic!
I don't even understand the argument that you're trying to make. Why do they have a better chance of becoming reality than the lineups with HOFers or potential HOFers? What ever that means anyway.
Go back to the original post!
Been there...
Still doesn't make sense.
If you can't figure it out, you are helpless!
Well that's a creative way to have a discussion.
Why don't you enlighten me and explain it to me like I'm 5?
How is a lineup of future stars more realistic than a lineup of HOFers? I honestly do not understand the argument you're making, in particular because you haven't actually made one.
And I don't have any issues with future star cards...
With many of these legends in these lineups are dead, so there is definitely a zero chance of having these lineups become realistic, however there is still (however slight) a chance that these players in the FS cards become worthy at some point of those stats. Slight chance is greater than zero chance.
Bruh not a single person cares how realistic a lineup is in this game. You clearly don't understand the argument here
That is my point, they get all upset about how unreal the FS cards are, but not how unreal their lineups are! Which pretty much defeats their own argument of why they don't want to see FS cards!
You're still missing the point. FS get hate because they are given juiced up cards they haven't earned that are better than literal hall of famers. Legends cards are based off of actual stats, while FS are based off of projections. That's the argument. Has nothing to do with realism of lineups
No, I'm on point! You are just ignoring the point!
-
@dap1234567890 said in Two Questions:
@dewrock_psn said in Two Questions:
@dap1234567890 said in Two Questions:
@dewrock_psn said in Two Questions:
@dap1234567890 said in Two Questions:
@dewrock_psn said in Two Questions:
@dap1234567890 said in Two Questions:
@ballneverlie_xbl said in Two Questions:
Well comparing HOF and soon to be HOFers to players that havent done jack is a big difference.
Its a video game so whatever floats your boat. More content the better
There is a difference in what they have accomplished in real life, but those cards still have a better chance of becoming reality than those lineups that the people who are complaining they are unrealistic!
I don't even understand the argument that you're trying to make. Why do they have a better chance of becoming reality than the lineups with HOFers or potential HOFers? What ever that means anyway.
Go back to the original post!
Been there...
Still doesn't make sense.
If you can't figure it out, you are helpless!
Well that's a creative way to have a discussion.
Why don't you enlighten me and explain it to me like I'm 5?
How is a lineup of future stars more realistic than a lineup of HOFers? I honestly do not understand the argument you're making, in particular because you haven't actually made one.
And I don't have any issues with future star cards...
With many of these legends in these lineups are dead, so there is definitely a zero chance of having these lineups become realistic, however there is still (however slight) a chance that these players in the FS cards become worthy at some point of those stats. Slight chance is greater than zero chance.
Huh? What realism are you talking about? Like them all playing together in real life? They've already put up the stats in their career, that's the point of the DD card for them.
Like I said, I don't have a problem with FS cards but I obviously made up projected stats aren't even close to as realistic as actual real stats.
-
@dap1234567890 said in Two Questions:
@sauciestburrito_psn said in Two Questions:
@dap1234567890 said in Two Questions:
@dewrock_psn said in Two Questions:
@dap1234567890 said in Two Questions:
@dewrock_psn said in Two Questions:
@dap1234567890 said in Two Questions:
@dewrock_psn said in Two Questions:
@dap1234567890 said in Two Questions:
@ballneverlie_xbl said in Two Questions:
Well comparing HOF and soon to be HOFers to players that havent done jack is a big difference.
Its a video game so whatever floats your boat. More content the better
There is a difference in what they have accomplished in real life, but those cards still have a better chance of becoming reality than those lineups that the people who are complaining they are unrealistic!
I don't even understand the argument that you're trying to make. Why do they have a better chance of becoming reality than the lineups with HOFers or potential HOFers? What ever that means anyway.
Go back to the original post!
Been there...
Still doesn't make sense.
If you can't figure it out, you are helpless!
Well that's a creative way to have a discussion.
Why don't you enlighten me and explain it to me like I'm 5?
How is a lineup of future stars more realistic than a lineup of HOFers? I honestly do not understand the argument you're making, in particular because you haven't actually made one.
And I don't have any issues with future star cards...
With many of these legends in these lineups are dead, so there is definitely a zero chance of having these lineups become realistic, however there is still (however slight) a chance that these players in the FS cards become worthy at some point of those stats. Slight chance is greater than zero chance.
Bruh not a single person cares how realistic a lineup is in this game. You clearly don't understand the argument here
That is my point, they get all upset about how unreal the FS cards are, but not how unreal their lineups are! Which pretty much defeats their own argument of why they don't want to see FS cards!
@dap1234567890 said in Two Questions:
@sauciestburrito_psn said in Two Questions:
@dap1234567890 said in Two Questions:
@dewrock_psn said in Two Questions:
@dap1234567890 said in Two Questions:
@dewrock_psn said in Two Questions:
@dap1234567890 said in Two Questions:
@dewrock_psn said in Two Questions:
@dap1234567890 said in Two Questions:
@ballneverlie_xbl said in Two Questions:
Well comparing HOF and soon to be HOFers to players that havent done jack is a big difference.
Its a video game so whatever floats your boat. More content the better
There is a difference in what they have accomplished in real life, but those cards still have a better chance of becoming reality than those lineups that the people who are complaining they are unrealistic!
I don't even understand the argument that you're trying to make. Why do they have a better chance of becoming reality than the lineups with HOFers or potential HOFers? What ever that means anyway.
Go back to the original post!
Been there...
Still doesn't make sense.
If you can't figure it out, you are helpless!
Well that's a creative way to have a discussion.
Why don't you enlighten me and explain it to me like I'm 5?
How is a lineup of future stars more realistic than a lineup of HOFers? I honestly do not understand the argument you're making, in particular because you haven't actually made one.
And I don't have any issues with future star cards...
With many of these legends in these lineups are dead, so there is definitely a zero chance of having these lineups become realistic, however there is still (however slight) a chance that these players in the FS cards become worthy at some point of those stats. Slight chance is greater than zero chance.
Bruh not a single person cares how realistic a lineup is in this game. You clearly don't understand the argument here
That is my point, they get all upset about how unreal the FS cards are, but not how unreal their lineups are! Which pretty much defeats their own argument of why they don't want to see FS cards!
None of the lineups are real. It's a video game. This isn't an argument in favor of any side of this "apparent" debate.
-
@dap1234567890 said in Two Questions:
@sauciestburrito_psn said in Two Questions:
@dap1234567890 said in Two Questions:
@sauciestburrito_psn said in Two Questions:
@dap1234567890 said in Two Questions:
@dewrock_psn said in Two Questions:
@dap1234567890 said in Two Questions:
@dewrock_psn said in Two Questions:
@dap1234567890 said in Two Questions:
@dewrock_psn said in Two Questions:
@dap1234567890 said in Two Questions:
@ballneverlie_xbl said in Two Questions:
Well comparing HOF and soon to be HOFers to players that havent done jack is a big difference.
Its a video game so whatever floats your boat. More content the better
There is a difference in what they have accomplished in real life, but those cards still have a better chance of becoming reality than those lineups that the people who are complaining they are unrealistic!
I don't even understand the argument that you're trying to make. Why do they have a better chance of becoming reality than the lineups with HOFers or potential HOFers? What ever that means anyway.
Go back to the original post!
Been there...
Still doesn't make sense.
If you can't figure it out, you are helpless!
Well that's a creative way to have a discussion.
Why don't you enlighten me and explain it to me like I'm 5?
How is a lineup of future stars more realistic than a lineup of HOFers? I honestly do not understand the argument you're making, in particular because you haven't actually made one.
And I don't have any issues with future star cards...
With many of these legends in these lineups are dead, so there is definitely a zero chance of having these lineups become realistic, however there is still (however slight) a chance that these players in the FS cards become worthy at some point of those stats. Slight chance is greater than zero chance.
Bruh not a single person cares how realistic a lineup is in this game. You clearly don't understand the argument here
That is my point, they get all upset about how unreal the FS cards are, but not how unreal their lineups are! Which pretty much defeats their own argument of why they don't want to see FS cards!
You're still missing the point. FS get hate because they are given juiced up cards they haven't earned that are better than literal hall of famers. Legends cards are based off of actual stats, while FS are based off of projections. That's the argument. Has nothing to do with realism of lineups
No, I'm on point! You are just ignoring the point!
I'm not even sure you know what your point is. You're certainly struggling to articulate it.
-
@dewrock_PSN
He's really not, you're just having a hard time understanding it.
All the HOFers in the game were not alive at the same point, therefore they could never be in the same lineup together.
Future Stars are all currently in the minors (some in majors) and therefore have a chance of being on the field together therefore making it more realistic.
There is you're 5 year old explanation -
@dap1234567890 said in Two Questions:
@sauciestburrito_psn said in Two Questions:
@dap1234567890 said in Two Questions:
@sauciestburrito_psn said in Two Questions:
@dap1234567890 said in Two Questions:
@dewrock_psn said in Two Questions:
@dap1234567890 said in Two Questions:
@dewrock_psn said in Two Questions:
@dap1234567890 said in Two Questions:
@dewrock_psn said in Two Questions:
@dap1234567890 said in Two Questions:
@ballneverlie_xbl said in Two Questions:
Well comparing HOF and soon to be HOFers to players that havent done jack is a big difference.
Its a video game so whatever floats your boat. More content the better
There is a difference in what they have accomplished in real life, but those cards still have a better chance of becoming reality than those lineups that the people who are complaining they are unrealistic!
I don't even understand the argument that you're trying to make. Why do they have a better chance of becoming reality than the lineups with HOFers or potential HOFers? What ever that means anyway.
Go back to the original post!
Been there...
Still doesn't make sense.
If you can't figure it out, you are helpless!
Well that's a creative way to have a discussion.
Why don't you enlighten me and explain it to me like I'm 5?
How is a lineup of future stars more realistic than a lineup of HOFers? I honestly do not understand the argument you're making, in particular because you haven't actually made one.
And I don't have any issues with future star cards...
With many of these legends in these lineups are dead, so there is definitely a zero chance of having these lineups become realistic, however there is still (however slight) a chance that these players in the FS cards become worthy at some point of those stats. Slight chance is greater than zero chance.
Bruh not a single person cares how realistic a lineup is in this game. You clearly don't understand the argument here
That is my point, they get all upset about how unreal the FS cards are, but not how unreal their lineups are! Which pretty much defeats their own argument of why they don't want to see FS cards!
You're still missing the point. FS get hate because they are given juiced up cards they haven't earned that are better than literal hall of famers. Legends cards are based off of actual stats, while FS are based off of projections. That's the argument. Has nothing to do with realism of lineups
No, I'm on point! You are just ignoring the point!
Lol ok dude well your point is irrelevant and has nothing to do with the argument then
-
Fake juiced cards are better than HOF cards based on real seasons/careers, because even though they are fake, they are still alive? That's the point you are trying to make?
Well, that's an opinion I guess. -
@poksey_mlbts said in Two Questions:
Fake juiced cards are better than HOF cards based on real seasons/careers, because even though they are fake, they are still alive? That's the point you are trying to make?
Well, that's an opinion I guess.Where did anyone say "Fake juiced cards are better than HOF cards based on real seasons/careers, because even though they are fake, they are still alive?"
Is that you're bad attempt in creating a "straw man"?
-
@dap1234567890 said in Two Questions:
@poksey_mlbts said in Two Questions:
Fake juiced cards are better than HOF cards based on real seasons/careers, because even though they are fake, they are still alive? That's the point you are trying to make?
Well, that's an opinion I guess.Where did anyone say "Fake juiced cards are better than HOF cards based on real seasons/careers, because even though they are fake, they are still alive?"
Is that you're bad attempt in creating a "straw man"?
I mean, how else would you describe it?
@dap1234567890 said in Two Questions:
@dewrock_psn said in Two Questions:
@dap1234567890 said in Two Questions:
@dewrock_psn said in Two Questions:
@dap1234567890 said in Two Questions:
@dewrock_psn said in Two Questions:
@dap1234567890 said in Two Questions:
@ballneverlie_xbl said in Two Questions:
Well comparing HOF and soon to be HOFers to players that havent done jack is a big difference.
Its a video game so whatever floats your boat. More content the better
There is a difference in what they have accomplished in real life, but those cards still have a better chance of becoming reality than those lineups that the people who are complaining they are unrealistic!
I don't even understand the argument that you're trying to make. Why do they have a better chance of becoming reality than the lineups with HOFers or potential HOFers? What ever that means anyway.
Go back to the original post!
Been there...
Still doesn't make sense.
If you can't figure it out, you are helpless!
Well that's a creative way to have a discussion.
Why don't you enlighten me and explain it to me like I'm 5?
How is a lineup of future stars more realistic than a lineup of HOFers? I honestly do not understand the argument you're making, in particular because you haven't actually made one.
And I don't have any issues with future star cards...
With many of these legends in these lineups are dead, so there is definitely a zero chance of having these lineups become realistic, however there is still (however slight) a chance that these players in the FS cards become worthy at some point of those stats. Slight chance is greater than zero chance.
-
@poksey_mlbts said in Two Questions:
@dap1234567890 said in Two Questions:
@poksey_mlbts said in Two Questions:
Fake juiced cards are better than HOF cards based on real seasons/careers, because even though they are fake, they are still alive? That's the point you are trying to make?
Well, that's an opinion I guess.Where did anyone say "Fake juiced cards are better than HOF cards based on real seasons/careers, because even though they are fake, they are still alive?"
Is that you're bad attempt in creating a "straw man"?
I mean, how else would you describe it?
@dap1234567890 said in Two Questions:
@dewrock_psn said in Two Questions:
@dap1234567890 said in Two Questions:
@dewrock_psn said in Two Questions:
@dap1234567890 said in Two Questions:
@dewrock_psn said in Two Questions:
@dap1234567890 said in Two Questions:
@ballneverlie_xbl said in Two Questions:
Well comparing HOF and soon to be HOFers to players that havent done jack is a big difference.
Its a video game so whatever floats your boat. More content the better
There is a difference in what they have accomplished in real life, but those cards still have a better chance of becoming reality than those lineups that the people who are complaining they are unrealistic!
I don't even understand the argument that you're trying to make. Why do they have a better chance of becoming reality than the lineups with HOFers or potential HOFers? What ever that means anyway.
Go back to the original post!
Been there...
Still doesn't make sense.
If you can't figure it out, you are helpless!
Well that's a creative way to have a discussion.
Why don't you enlighten me and explain it to me like I'm 5?
How is a lineup of future stars more realistic than a lineup of HOFers? I honestly do not understand the argument you're making, in particular because you haven't actually made one.
And I don't have any issues with future star cards...
With many of these legends in these lineups are dead, so there is definitely a zero chance of having these lineups become realistic, however there is still (however slight) a chance that these players in the FS cards become worthy at some point of those stats. Slight chance is greater than zero chance.
There's nothing that says anything card is better than any other card. You are creating a straw man.
-
Your entire premise revolves around how realistic a lineup is, which was never a point of contention and nobody has ever cared about. I guess there's a reason this is the first time I've ever heard such a weird, irrelevant take on FS cards lol
-
So basically this thread boils down to the OP saying why hate future stars when everything is unrealistic... The thread is saying no one hates the future stars concept, just that they make them better than Hall of Famers.. Which the OP responses back with its unrealistic anyway... And the thread again responds with we know, we just want Hall of Famers to be the best cards in the game because they earned it. And the cycle continues...
-
@dap1234567890 said in Two Questions:
@poksey_mlbts said in Two Questions:
@dap1234567890 said in Two Questions:
@poksey_mlbts said in Two Questions:
Fake juiced cards are better than HOF cards based on real seasons/careers, because even though they are fake, they are still alive? That's the point you are trying to make?
Well, that's an opinion I guess.Where did anyone say "Fake juiced cards are better than HOF cards based on real seasons/careers, because even though they are fake, they are still alive?"
Is that you're bad attempt in creating a "straw man"?
I mean, how else would you describe it?
@dap1234567890 said in Two Questions:
@dewrock_psn said in Two Questions:
@dap1234567890 said in Two Questions:
@dewrock_psn said in Two Questions:
@dap1234567890 said in Two Questions:
@dewrock_psn said in Two Questions:
@dap1234567890 said in Two Questions:
@ballneverlie_xbl said in Two Questions:
Well comparing HOF and soon to be HOFers to players that havent done jack is a big difference.
Its a video game so whatever floats your boat. More content the better
There is a difference in what they have accomplished in real life, but those cards still have a better chance of becoming reality than those lineups that the people who are complaining they are unrealistic!
I don't even understand the argument that you're trying to make. Why do they have a better chance of becoming reality than the lineups with HOFers or potential HOFers? What ever that means anyway.
Go back to the original post!
Been there...
Still doesn't make sense.
If you can't figure it out, you are helpless!
Well that's a creative way to have a discussion.
Why don't you enlighten me and explain it to me like I'm 5?
How is a lineup of future stars more realistic than a lineup of HOFers? I honestly do not understand the argument you're making, in particular because you haven't actually made one.
And I don't have any issues with future star cards...
With many of these legends in these lineups are dead, so there is definitely a zero chance of having these lineups become realistic, however there is still (however slight) a chance that these players in the FS cards become worthy at some point of those stats. Slight chance is greater than zero chance.
There's nothing that says anything card is better than any other card.
You know what I am saying.
Having future stars cards in the game are "better" than dead players cards because it's more realistic. That is your argument, not mine. -
@poksey_mlbts said in Two Questions:
@dap1234567890 said in Two Questions:
@poksey_mlbts said in Two Questions:
@dap1234567890 said in Two Questions:
@poksey_mlbts said in Two Questions:
Fake juiced cards are better than HOF cards based on real seasons/careers, because even though they are fake, they are still alive? That's the point you are trying to make?
Well, that's an opinion I guess.Where did anyone say "Fake juiced cards are better than HOF cards based on real seasons/careers, because even though they are fake, they are still alive?"
Is that you're bad attempt in creating a "straw man"?
I mean, how else would you describe it?
@dap1234567890 said in Two Questions:
@dewrock_psn said in Two Questions:
@dap1234567890 said in Two Questions:
@dewrock_psn said in Two Questions:
@dap1234567890 said in Two Questions:
@dewrock_psn said in Two Questions:
@dap1234567890 said in Two Questions:
@ballneverlie_xbl said in Two Questions:
Well comparing HOF and soon to be HOFers to players that havent done jack is a big difference.
Its a video game so whatever floats your boat. More content the better
There is a difference in what they have accomplished in real life, but those cards still have a better chance of becoming reality than those lineups that the people who are complaining they are unrealistic!
I don't even understand the argument that you're trying to make. Why do they have a better chance of becoming reality than the lineups with HOFers or potential HOFers? What ever that means anyway.
Go back to the original post!
Been there...
Still doesn't make sense.
If you can't figure it out, you are helpless!
Well that's a creative way to have a discussion.
Why don't you enlighten me and explain it to me like I'm 5?
How is a lineup of future stars more realistic than a lineup of HOFers? I honestly do not understand the argument you're making, in particular because you haven't actually made one.
And I don't have any issues with future star cards...
With many of these legends in these lineups are dead, so there is definitely a zero chance of having these lineups become realistic, however there is still (however slight) a chance that these players in the FS cards become worthy at some point of those stats. Slight chance is greater than zero chance.
There's nothing that says anything card is better than any other card.
You know what I am saying.
Having future stars cards in the game are "better" than dead players cards because it's more realistic. That is your argument, not mine.That is not my argument! Again, creating a straw man! In fact, I do not even have an "argument".
-
@dap1234567890 said in Two Questions:
@poksey_mlbts said in Two Questions:
@dap1234567890 said in Two Questions:
@poksey_mlbts said in Two Questions:
@dap1234567890 said in Two Questions:
@poksey_mlbts said in Two Questions:
Fake juiced cards are better than HOF cards based on real seasons/careers, because even though they are fake, they are still alive? That's the point you are trying to make?
Well, that's an opinion I guess.Where did anyone say "Fake juiced cards are better than HOF cards based on real seasons/careers, because even though they are fake, they are still alive?"
Is that you're bad attempt in creating a "straw man"?
I mean, how else would you describe it?
@dap1234567890 said in Two Questions:
@dewrock_psn said in Two Questions:
@dap1234567890 said in Two Questions:
@dewrock_psn said in Two Questions:
@dap1234567890 said in Two Questions:
@dewrock_psn said in Two Questions:
@dap1234567890 said in Two Questions:
@ballneverlie_xbl said in Two Questions:
Well comparing HOF and soon to be HOFers to players that havent done jack is a big difference.
Its a video game so whatever floats your boat. More content the better
There is a difference in what they have accomplished in real life, but those cards still have a better chance of becoming reality than those lineups that the people who are complaining they are unrealistic!
I don't even understand the argument that you're trying to make. Why do they have a better chance of becoming reality than the lineups with HOFers or potential HOFers? What ever that means anyway.
Go back to the original post!
Been there...
Still doesn't make sense.
If you can't figure it out, you are helpless!
Well that's a creative way to have a discussion.
Why don't you enlighten me and explain it to me like I'm 5?
How is a lineup of future stars more realistic than a lineup of HOFers? I honestly do not understand the argument you're making, in particular because you haven't actually made one.
And I don't have any issues with future star cards...
With many of these legends in these lineups are dead, so there is definitely a zero chance of having these lineups become realistic, however there is still (however slight) a chance that these players in the FS cards become worthy at some point of those stats. Slight chance is greater than zero chance.
There's nothing that says anything card is better than any other card.
You know what I am saying.
Having future stars cards in the game are "better" than dead players cards because it's more realistic. That is your argument, not mine.That is not my argument! Again, creating a straw man!
Alright man. You do you. Keep fighting the good fight, or whatever it is you think you are doing here.
-
If people hate on FS players they better not be running out a CAP…
-
@washednd_psn said in Two Questions:
If people hate on FS players they better not be running out a CAP…
Hahaha, yes!
-
@dap1234567890 said in Two Questions:
@poksey_mlbts said in Two Questions:
@dap1234567890 said in Two Questions:
@poksey_mlbts said in Two Questions:
@dap1234567890 said in Two Questions:
@poksey_mlbts said in Two Questions:
Fake juiced cards are better than HOF cards based on real seasons/careers, because even though they are fake, they are still alive? That's the point you are trying to make?
Well, that's an opinion I guess.Where did anyone say "Fake juiced cards are better than HOF cards based on real seasons/careers, because even though they are fake, they are still alive?"
Is that you're bad attempt in creating a "straw man"?
I mean, how else would you describe it?
@dap1234567890 said in Two Questions:
@dewrock_psn said in Two Questions:
@dap1234567890 said in Two Questions:
@dewrock_psn said in Two Questions:
@dap1234567890 said in Two Questions:
@dewrock_psn said in Two Questions:
@dap1234567890 said in Two Questions:
@ballneverlie_xbl said in Two Questions:
Well comparing HOF and soon to be HOFers to players that havent done jack is a big difference.
Its a video game so whatever floats your boat. More content the better
There is a difference in what they have accomplished in real life, but those cards still have a better chance of becoming reality than those lineups that the people who are complaining they are unrealistic!
I don't even understand the argument that you're trying to make. Why do they have a better chance of becoming reality than the lineups with HOFers or potential HOFers? What ever that means anyway.
Go back to the original post!
Been there...
Still doesn't make sense.
If you can't figure it out, you are helpless!
Well that's a creative way to have a discussion.
Why don't you enlighten me and explain it to me like I'm 5?
How is a lineup of future stars more realistic than a lineup of HOFers? I honestly do not understand the argument you're making, in particular because you haven't actually made one.
And I don't have any issues with future star cards...
With many of these legends in these lineups are dead, so there is definitely a zero chance of having these lineups become realistic, however there is still (however slight) a chance that these players in the FS cards become worthy at some point of those stats. Slight chance is greater than zero chance.
There's nothing that says anything card is better than any other card.
You know what I am saying.
Having future stars cards in the game are "better" than dead players cards because it's more realistic. That is your argument, not mine.That is not my argument! Again, creating a straw man! In fact, I do not even have an "argument".
Lol what is the point of this thread then?
to say this game is unrealistic? That's a given. DD is a fantasy card building game. -
@ikasnu_psn said in Two Questions:
My issue with Future Stars was there were too many of them in last year's game. I actually made a post about it, this was in response to TA2 and a few FS headliners coming out
They did a much better job this year of cycling them through, instead of lineups consisting of almost all FS cards, you only see a few. Which wasn't the case last year after TA2.
There are only 2 FS cards I don't like this year are Cabrera, for obvious reasons, and Pearson, because it seems like the only reason they used him again this year because he was an extreme reward last year. I love the future stars cards when they are top 10 prospects. Wander, Adley, Tork, Witt, and J-Rod are legitimately future stars of baseball. Robert Puason, Issac Paredes? There is certainly an argument that they shouldn't have diamond cards, but they were barely used at the time they came out so who cares
