Instead of showdown, repeatable conquest should be a thing
-
I dont see why it would have to be "instead of". I like the idea, they could implement it additionally. I like showdown, so prefer they keep it around.
-
What if they just made it 5 points per team stronghold on conquest and it's repeatable? That way you can only earn 5 points for that team per run through the map.
-
I see perhaps a turn based conquest going for a one and done affinity points but dont see much more than that. It sucks that showdown and M2O dont give you individual team innings for ta. People just want to double task.....like me....doing m2 O and also playing cpu games for my dailies since the conquest maps are almost done.
-
Agree, Conquest maps and and the occasional player program are what even keeps me on this game. It's def. the least aggravating part of the game
-
@DoIHearBossMusic said in Instead of showdown, repeatable conquest should be a thing:
Agree, Conquest maps and and the occasional player program are what even keeps me on this game. It's def. the least aggravating part of the game
I agree, those are really what I like about the game, everything is is a neccessary evil.
-
@DrackSaur said in Instead of showdown, repeatable conquest should be a thing:
Title says it. We should have small, repeatable conquests that give you TA points. You’d have to conquer each division and you would make the same amount as you do in showdown
I love this idea. Some of us suck like me but love playing the game and getting new cards. I’ve only beat one showdown and that was no stage two. Played like a 100 and only beat one. I love conquest and would love to see it added in to ta points.
-
Maybe make it like a mini conquest extreme: divisions. Get all strongholds by turn 3, or whatever number. I miss conquest extreme, was such a fun mode, which was something I never thought I'd say when I first started playing.
-
I could definitely see this coming with Stage 3.
We already have divisional showdowns for Stage 1, league showdowns for Stage 2, so why not give us two 15 team conquest maps for each league?
Unless they just add one full-MLB showdown for Stage 3, I don’t think this is that outlandish of an idea.
-
@nflman2033 said in Instead of showdown, repeatable conquest should be a thing:
@DoIHearBossMusic said in Instead of showdown, repeatable conquest should be a thing:
Agree, Conquest maps and and the occasional player program are what even keeps me on this game. It's def. the least aggravating part of the game
I agree, those are really what I like about the game, everything is is a neccessary evil.
It would also be nice if all the packs were a bit more rewarding, a bit tired of seeing all of this bronze and silver garbage. Maybe I should start streaming, SDS always juices streamer packs
-
@Kovz88 said in Instead of showdown, repeatable conquest should be a thing:
While that would be nice, the points you get for showdown are the reward for going the harder route. They shouldn't reward people the same amount of points for taking the easy way out.
-
I agree, I think SDS needs to throw us a bone or two for the mediocre gameplay and lack of communication.
-
They create new maps each inning or special occasions that are are one offs that are played once and take up space. I think they should be repeatable, but not for extra points. Instead the reward should escalate after every completion. Say 2 completions nets a couple TA packs, 5 is a show 5pack and Stage 1 TA ticket, 10 is a 10pack and 5 S1-TA tickets, 20 is a ballin 5pack, and 50 nets a show 50 pack. The number of completions needed would scale depending on the size of the map. This is a grind, but at least it’s not moments and a hard core stat grind.
-
@DrackSaur said in Instead of showdown, repeatable conquest should be a thing:
Title says it. We should have small, repeatable conquests that give you TA points. You’d have to conquer each division and you would make the same amount as you do in showdown
This person is a prophet.
-
@MrFoodMonsta said in Instead of showdown, repeatable conquest should be a thing:
@DrackSaur said in Instead of showdown, repeatable conquest should be a thing:
Title says it. We should have small, repeatable conquests that give you TA points. You’d have to conquer each division and you would make the same amount as you do in showdown
This person is a prophet.
LMAO all bow down
-
showdown can walk off a cliff and take moments with'em.
-
I agree! Showdown is too frustrating for me—life is stressful enough as it is without showdown adding more. But I would love more repeatable conquest maps! Only had two (the big U.S.A. one and Infinity map) last year.
-
@DrackSaur said in Instead of showdown, repeatable conquest should be a thing:
Title says it. We should have small, repeatable conquests that give you TA points. You’d have to conquer each division and you would make the same amount as you do in showdown
That would be awesome.
-
@DrackSaur said in Instead of showdown, repeatable conquest should be a thing:
Title says it. We should have small, repeatable conquests that give you TA points. You’d have to conquer each division and you would make the same amount as you do in showdown
This would be very popular. I would even say something good about SDS!
-
A admin locked this topic on
