Verlander and Cole
-
Any reason why these two keep climbing in price? Gerrit Cole dam near 200k which I think is insane but I still need to get him. Same with Verlander who is 100k now... should I wait to buy him or get him before he keeps climbing?
-
Gatekeepers will always rise in price with the market. They aren't susceptible to the better cards hitting the market fluctuation. Only time you may see them go down in price is when a large number of people start hitting high prestige levels and get the 90+ diamond packs that will have cards they likely already have and inventory on the market starts going up and that will be a while from now.
-
same i got so sick of it so i bought a 50 pack hoping to pull some nom luck
-
Yeah I just bit the bullet and bought the last Cole under 168k as the rest were all 5k higher. Hurts more that I considered Verlander (who is now the last high diamond I need) for around 50k in March.
Guess I'll just have to grind out more stubs haha
-
Something funky with the market, I know u need them for collections but they are still over priced. Trout cost 320k and plus cole 160k. Bunch of other cards are way too much also, but its fine I'll make more stubbs from the ppl that over spend, Degroom is fair price for around 100k
-
Yea, its nuts. Based on prices of yesterday afternoon, I need 1.2M stubs to finish my live series collection. For 12 players. I need some of that mysterious pack luck or after game rewards I keep hearing about.
-
I've said this about 10 times on this forum already, but the 90+ Live series diamonds must no be included in the typical 1:50 diamond odds for a typical pack. I think it is closer to 1:150 for the 90+ LS, and we should be told what it is! Since packs are the only way Live series are added to the market there are just not enough in the market to keep up with demand. I also do not see demand for these cards going down, as more people get closer to just needing these cards to complete collections.
-
The worst part is that the cards aren't very good in game
-
@pbake12 said in Verlander and Cole:
I've said this about 10 times on this forum already, but the 90+ Live series diamonds must no be included in the typical 1:50 diamond odds for a typical pack. I think it is closer to 1:150 for the 90+ LS, and we should be told what it is! Since packs are the only way Live series are added to the market there are just not enough in the market to keep up with demand. I also do see demand for these cards going down, as more people get closer to just needing these cards to complete collections.
Only 90+ I pulled in a standard pack was Trout, got Verlander as a post game reward after a conquest game on All-Star, I've pulled two diamonds in BIAH packs, Cole and Bellinger.
-
These are the last two I need as well to complete live series. I have been waiting since the stub sale thinking they were going to go down after the event. Here's to hoping they come back down a bit, but I am not sure it happens.
-
I think it’s the gatekeeper factor paired with the quality of cards available on the market from BR and WS rewards. They aren’t all that great right now compared to what will likely be there in a couple of months so I’m guessing a lot of people are going after Mantle, Sheffield, etc rather than spending on those cards. I’m interested to see what the prices are when some 99s are added to the top tier rewards. I bet they are crazy for quite a while.
-
Cole has jumped 15 k in the last few hours! WTF!! He is the last one I need for AL, and have about 140k... Sell now orders went from 160, then 165, then 170. stop this people.
-
I bought them both today to finish AL
Awful given their price
-
How long until Trout goes back down? Currently have 220k stubs
-
@olivegarden2 said in Verlander and Cole:
How long until Trout goes back down? Currently have 220k stubs
July
-
@Saberq269 said in Verlander and Cole:
@olivegarden2 said in Verlander and Cole:
How long until Trout goes back down? Currently have 220k stubs
July
I will save up for him and then wait for other diamonds to go down in price
-
@pbake12 said in Verlander and Cole:
I've said this about 10 times on this forum already, but the 90+ Live series diamonds must no be included in the typical 1:50 diamond odds for a typical pack. I think it is closer to 1:150 for the 90+ LS, and we should be told what it is! Since packs are the only way Live series are added to the market there are just not enough in the market to keep up with demand. I also do see demand for these cards going down, as more people get closer to just needing these cards to complete collections.
It’s wayyyy worse than 1:150. Probably closer to 1:10,000
-
@pbake12 said in Verlander and Cole:
I've said this about 10 times on this forum already, but the 90+ Live series diamonds must no be included in the typical 1:50 diamond odds for a typical pack. I think it is closer to 1:150 for the 90+ LS, and we should be told what it is! Since packs are the only way Live series are added to the market there are just not enough in the market to keep up with demand. I also do see demand for these cards going down, as more people get closer to just needing these cards to complete collections.
What probably needs to happen is not allow cash for stubs. You either have to play from way behind or participate in a video game casino. It's a great game, but this is a ridiculous element.
-
Just pulled Cole from the NL Central Showdown.
-
