Your browser does not seem to support JavaScript. As a result, your viewing experience will be diminished, and you have been placed in read-only mode.
Please download a browser that supports JavaScript, or enable it if it's disabled (i.e. NoScript).
As I did with TA2, which most of you guys seemed to enjoy, I am also going to make this thread for TA 3 reveals. As I did before I will post links to all the cards and attributes as they are revealed.
Schedule:
Card art for 98 Palmer Attributes
98 Dwight Evans card art Attributes
Donny baseball card art Attributes
98 Crime Dog card art Attributes
97 Paul Konerko cart art Attributes
99 Mr. Tiger himself- rest in peace legend Attributes
99 George Brett card art Attributes
99 Killebrew Attributes
card art for 98 Catfish Hunter Attributes
97 Buhner Card Art Attributes
97 Michael Young Card Art Attributes
99 Bagwell with attributes
99 Smoltz Attributes
97 Burnett Attributes
99 Dawson Attributes
97 Al Leiter Attributes
99 Schmidt and NLE Schmidt Attributes
97 Kerry Wood Attributes
98 Eric Davis Attributes
99 Robin Yount Attributes
97 Jason Kendall Attributes
98 Lou Brock Attributes
97 Matt Williams Attributes
97 Dante Bichette Attributes
98 Orel
99 Gwynn Attributes 99 Juan Marichal
As I did with TA2 and TA3, I feel like I’m obligated to make this post again for stage 4. As I did the other times I will have proof of the card as they are revealed and will add the attributes as they are revealed as well
Twins: 99 Nelson Cruz
Braves:99 Freddie Freeman
Mariners: 99 Kyle Lewis
Angels: 99 David Fletcher
Tigers: 99 Jeimer Candelario
Blue Jays: 99 Lourdes Gurriel Jr
Red Sox: 99 Xander Bogaerts
Orioles: 99 Anthony Santander
Diamondbacks: 99 Zac Gallen
Rays: 99 Nick Anderson
Royals: 99 Salvador Perez
Indians: 99 Shane Bieber
Cardinals: 99 Giovanny Gallegos
Marlins: 99 Miguel Rojas
Rockies: 99 Trevor Story
Yankees: 99 DJ Lemahieu
Nationals: might as well be 110 overall Juan Soto
Reds: 99 Trevor Bauer
Astros: 99 Kyle Tucker
Mets: 99 Jacob Degrom
Brewers: 99 Devin Williams
Cubs: 99 Yu Darvish
Rangers: 99 Lance Lynn
Pirates: 99 Jacob Stallings
Giants: 99 Mike Yastrzemski
Phillies: 99 JT Realmuto
White Sox: 99 Tim Anderson
A’s: 99 Liam Hendriks
Padres: 99 Manny Machado
I know some don't like the TA 2 rewards, and that no one asked for this but I'm going to do it anyway
White Sox: Dane Dunning Reveal: link text Attributes: Unknown
Yankees: Clarke Schmidt link text
Orioles: Ryan Mountcastle link text
Cubs: Nico Hoerner link text
Mets: Andres Gimenez link text
Angels: Brandon Marsh link text
Blue Jays: Kevin Smith link text
Diamondbacks: Alek Thomas link text
Cardinals: Nolan Gorman link text
Astros: Jose Urquidy link text
Padres: Taylor Trammell link text
Mariners: Evan White link text
Phillies: Adonis Medina link text
Brewers: Zack Brown link text
Royals: Brady Singerlink text
Dodgers: Brusdar Graterol link text
Giants: Heliot Ramos link text
Rays: Vidal Brujan link text
Braves: Kyle Wright link text
Indians: Nolan Jones link text
Rangers: Josh Jung link text
Athletics: Jorge Mateo link text Will Update as more are revealed
Man crack must be really good these days. Don't suggest anything like that again
Its not false advertising if you don’t know how odds work
Simple solution: Make pickoffs more effective. Clearly the person that keeps taking the extra step is in the wrong. If they get picked off a couple times they won’t take the extra step again
Before anyone complains about these bosses you gotta know this is a DIRECT result of the complaints of the “there are way too many 99s I can’t compete” crowd from last year
@raesONE said in You can replay Run it Back Conquest or Showdown to get as many packs as you want...:
That's a nice feature, although I gotta be the negative Nancy to point out that these cards aren't all that intriguing and because everything is replayable, they'll be dirt cheap. Still hoping for a connection reward of some sorts.
Easy exchange farm for TAs. Whether the players are good or not, 5k stubs or 10 exchange points for doing what looks like a short conquest map is good.
MLB players don't swing at balls, or the pitchers would throw them more often. Quit swinging at them
95% of the community doesn’t care about flipping or making profits. They just want to sell the card
@hustlinowl_psn said in Does SDS Give Sinkers and Cutters to Every Pitcher as the Year Goes On to Sell Packs?:
@the_dragon1912 said in Does SDS Give Sinkers and Cutters to Every Pitcher as the Year Goes On to Sell Packs?: @gohardgrandpa said in Does SDS Give Sinkers and Cutters to Every Pitcher as the Year Goes On to Sell Packs?: I was hoping it wasn’t gonna be like that this year. Last year was sinker central, they had Oprah giving them away to everyone. High sinkers have been a problem since at least 17. They were just more noticeable last year because changeups and curveballs were literally worthless More so because of new outlier quirks
@the_dragon1912 said in Does SDS Give Sinkers and Cutters to Every Pitcher as the Year Goes On to Sell Packs?:
@gohardgrandpa said in Does SDS Give Sinkers and Cutters to Every Pitcher as the Year Goes On to Sell Packs?: I was hoping it wasn’t gonna be like that this year. Last year was sinker central, they had Oprah giving them away to everyone. High sinkers have been a problem since at least 17. They were just more noticeable last year because changeups and curveballs were literally worthless
@gohardgrandpa said in Does SDS Give Sinkers and Cutters to Every Pitcher as the Year Goes On to Sell Packs?:
I was hoping it wasn’t gonna be like that this year. Last year was sinker central, they had Oprah giving them away to everyone.
High sinkers have been a problem since at least 17. They were just more noticeable last year because changeups and curveballs were literally worthless
More so because of new outlier quirks
Depends on the card I guess. Outlier on the fastball and no outlier on the sinker was good. Outlier on the sinker itself was trash IMO
two weeks from friday
https://mlb21.theshow.com/dashboard
@cdnmoneymaker93_xbl said in Question on Milestone Cards:
This is the best research paper ever presented on the MLB forums. I think it has more to do with "known" baseball milestones. So the 40/40 club or the 300 saves clubs these are milestones that even fair weather fans know and recognize. A 600 Stolen base club is not as windy used in talking about milestones as the 500 club is
This is the best research paper ever presented on the MLB forums.
I think it has more to do with "known" baseball milestones. So the 40/40 club or the 300 saves clubs these are milestones that even fair weather fans know and recognize. A 600 Stolen base club is not as windy used in talking about milestones as the 500 club is
I think you are spot on here. Thome has 612 career homeruns but I would bet good money he gets a 500 HR club card later on
@vipersneak_psn said in I think with no double xp a lot of people will struggle to complete the programs:
@doobiebross66-72 said in I think with no double xp a lot of people will struggle to complete the programs: @vipersneak_psn said in I think with no double xp a lot of people will struggle to complete the programs: @doobiebross66-72 said in I think with no double xp a lot of people will struggle to complete the programs: Just finished the stronghold game and won 5-0...shows I earned 5520XP which I admit is strange idk specifically how XP is earned but you all complaining about not making enough XP is simply ridiculous Edit: considering that the map was finished by beating the stronghold last, that XP total above may have included the XP for completing the last few missions within the conquest program...just a thought It isn’t ridiculous because not everyone is getting those levels of XP. I think that is the issue here. I get between 1-2 k xp for a conquest game regardless of how many runs scored or strikeouts. That’s not the issues here, that’s not even the subject of this post Even if you’re making 1-2k for conquest games, playing that and playing online modes will easily get you to 350k by end of program That’s the point here...OP thinks people won’t have enough time to get enough xp to get a boss, and that’s simply not true unless it’s a personal problem Well that is MY issue here. I shouldn’t have to play more than anyone else to get to 350k or 650k. There are people already at 650k. It is going to take me the entire month just to get to 350.
@doobiebross66-72 said in I think with no double xp a lot of people will struggle to complete the programs:
@vipersneak_psn said in I think with no double xp a lot of people will struggle to complete the programs: @doobiebross66-72 said in I think with no double xp a lot of people will struggle to complete the programs: Just finished the stronghold game and won 5-0...shows I earned 5520XP which I admit is strange idk specifically how XP is earned but you all complaining about not making enough XP is simply ridiculous Edit: considering that the map was finished by beating the stronghold last, that XP total above may have included the XP for completing the last few missions within the conquest program...just a thought It isn’t ridiculous because not everyone is getting those levels of XP. I think that is the issue here. I get between 1-2 k xp for a conquest game regardless of how many runs scored or strikeouts. That’s not the issues here, that’s not even the subject of this post Even if you’re making 1-2k for conquest games, playing that and playing online modes will easily get you to 350k by end of program That’s the point here...OP thinks people won’t have enough time to get enough xp to get a boss, and that’s simply not true unless it’s a personal problem
@doobiebross66-72 said in I think with no double xp a lot of people will struggle to complete the programs: Just finished the stronghold game and won 5-0...shows I earned 5520XP which I admit is strange idk specifically how XP is earned but you all complaining about not making enough XP is simply ridiculous Edit: considering that the map was finished by beating the stronghold last, that XP total above may have included the XP for completing the last few missions within the conquest program...just a thought It isn’t ridiculous because not everyone is getting those levels of XP. I think that is the issue here. I get between 1-2 k xp for a conquest game regardless of how many runs scored or strikeouts.
Just finished the stronghold game and won 5-0...shows I earned 5520XP which I admit is strange idk specifically how XP is earned but you all complaining about not making enough XP is simply ridiculous Edit: considering that the map was finished by beating the stronghold last, that XP total above may have included the XP for completing the last few missions within the conquest program...just a thought
Just finished the stronghold game and won 5-0...shows I earned 5520XP which I admit is strange
idk specifically how XP is earned but you all complaining about not making enough XP is simply ridiculous
Edit: considering that the map was finished by beating the stronghold last, that XP total above may have included the XP for completing the last few missions within the conquest program...just a thought
It isn’t ridiculous because not everyone is getting those levels of XP. I think that is the issue here. I get between 1-2 k xp for a conquest game regardless of how many runs scored or strikeouts.
That’s not the issues here, that’s not even the subject of this post
Even if you’re making 1-2k for conquest games, playing that and playing online modes will easily get you to 350k by end of program
That’s the point here...OP thinks people won’t have enough time to get enough xp to get a boss, and that’s simply not true unless it’s a personal problem
Well that is MY issue here. I shouldn’t have to play more than anyone else to get to 350k or 650k. There are people already at 650k. It is going to take me the entire month just to get to 350.
It's SUPPOSED to take casual player the entire month to get 350k. Only hardcore players are meant to even sniff 650k. Yeah there have been glitches and exploits to get people there quicker. But who cares
@t-rox_09_mlbts said in Unplayable:
@the_dragon1912 said in Unplayable: @t-rox_09_mlbts said in Unplayable: @yankblan_psn said in Unplayable: Use throwing meter on defence; no error possible if you’re accurate This is terrible advice How so? Using button accuracy/throwing meter I haven't made a throwing error in 4 years that wasn't my fault Button accuracy is 100% on the user. Meter there is rng involved using the cards stats. Button accuracy is the way to go, not meter.
@the_dragon1912 said in Unplayable:
@t-rox_09_mlbts said in Unplayable: @yankblan_psn said in Unplayable: Use throwing meter on defence; no error possible if you’re accurate This is terrible advice How so? Using button accuracy/throwing meter I haven't made a throwing error in 4 years that wasn't my fault
@yankblan_psn said in Unplayable: Use throwing meter on defence; no error possible if you’re accurate This is terrible advice
@yankblan_psn said in Unplayable:
Use throwing meter on defence; no error possible if you’re accurate
This is terrible advice
How so? Using button accuracy/throwing meter I haven't made a throwing error in 4 years that wasn't my fault
Button accuracy is 100% on the user. Meter there is rng involved using the cards stats. Button accuracy is the way to go, not meter.
I was under the impression that that original comment meant button accuracy
@c7susb9_psn said in Predictions for the prime headliner on Friday:
Since we’re likely in the 92-94ovr range, and it’s a prime card, I think we could be looking at folks like Saberhagen, Orlando Hernandez, Cole Hamels, Dennis Martinez, or a decent amount of relievers in the same range
You got to look at past years overalls for prime/awards/signature/ and milestones. Saberhagen was a 97 last year and Hamels was a 96. EL Duque fits. Dennis Martinez is no longer in the game. Ones that fit would be Greg Holland, Sergio Romo, and those types
@icyicecube_mlbts said in Does user input matter?:
@the_dragon1912 said in Does user input matter?: While yea, that should not be a homerun, the opponents feedback has never once worked correctly so I wouldn't put too much into it I figured, just weird how if someone gets a perfect perfect it shows right, but other times its just off. Oh well
@the_dragon1912 said in Does user input matter?:
While yea, that should not be a homerun, the opponents feedback has never once worked correctly so I wouldn't put too much into it
I figured, just weird how if someone gets a perfect perfect it shows right, but other times its just off. Oh well
It's the same reason people get perfect perfect foul balls. You don't actually hit a perfect perfect foul ball, the feedback telling you it is perfect is wrong. There's no way of knowing if your opponent was actually on that ball or not