As I did with TA2, which most of you guys seemed to enjoy, I am also going to make this thread for TA 3 reveals. As I did before I will post links to all the cards and attributes as they are revealed.

Schedule:

Card art for 98 Palmer
Attributes

98 Dwight Evans card art
Attributes

Donny baseball card art
Attributes

98 Crime Dog card art
Attributes

97 Paul Konerko cart art
Attributes

99 Mr. Tiger himself- rest in peace legend
Attributes

99 George Brett card art
Attributes

99 Killebrew
Attributes

card art for 98 Catfish Hunter
Attributes

97 Buhner Card Art
Attributes

97 Michael Young Card Art
Attributes

99 Bagwell with attributes

99 Smoltz
Attributes

97 Burnett
Attributes

99 Dawson
Attributes

97 Al Leiter
Attributes

99 Schmidt and NLE
Schmidt Attributes

97 Kerry Wood
Attributes

98 Eric Davis
Attributes

99 Robin Yount
Attributes

97 Jason Kendall
Attributes

98 Lou Brock
Attributes

97 Matt Williams
Attributes

97 Dante Bichette
Attributes

98 Orel

99 Gwynn
Attributes
99 Juan Marichal

As I did with TA2 and TA3, I feel like I’m obligated to make this post again for stage 4. As I did the other times I will have proof of the card as they are revealed and will add the attributes as they are revealed as well

Twins: 99 Nelson Cruz

Braves:99 Freddie Freeman

Mariners: 99 Kyle Lewis

Angels: 99 David Fletcher

Tigers: 99 Jeimer Candelario

Blue Jays: 99 Lourdes Gurriel Jr

Red Sox: 99 Xander Bogaerts

Orioles: 99 Anthony Santander

Diamondbacks: 99 Zac Gallen

Rays: 99 Nick Anderson

Royals: 99 Salvador Perez

Indians: 99 Shane Bieber

Cardinals: 99 Giovanny Gallegos

Marlins: 99 Miguel Rojas

Rockies: 99 Trevor Story

Yankees: 99 DJ Lemahieu

Nationals: might as well be 110 overall Juan Soto

Reds: 99 Trevor Bauer

Astros: 99 Kyle Tucker

Mets: 99 Jacob Degrom

Brewers: 99 Devin Williams

Cubs: 99 Yu Darvish

Rangers: 99 Lance Lynn

Pirates: 99 Jacob Stallings

Giants: 99 Mike Yastrzemski

Phillies: 99 JT Realmuto

White Sox: 99 Tim Anderson

A’s: 99 Liam Hendriks

Padres: 99 Manny Machado

I know some don't like the TA 2 rewards, and that no one asked for this but I'm going to do it anyway

White Sox: Dane Dunning Reveal: link text
Attributes: Unknown

Yankees: Clarke Schmidt link text

Orioles: Ryan Mountcastle link text

Cubs: Nico Hoerner link text

Mets: Andres Gimenez link text

Angels: Brandon Marsh link text

Blue Jays: Kevin Smith link text

Diamondbacks: Alek Thomas link text

Cardinals: Nolan Gorman link text

Astros: Jose Urquidy link text

Padres: Taylor Trammell link text

Mariners: Evan White link text

Phillies: Adonis Medina link text

Brewers: Zack Brown link text

Royals: Brady Singerlink text

Dodgers: Brusdar Graterol link text

Giants: Heliot Ramos link text

Rays: Vidal Brujan link text

Braves: Kyle Wright link text

Indians: Nolan Jones link text

Rangers: Josh Jung link text

Athletics: Jorge Mateo link text
Will Update as more are revealed

If the game not forcing you to hang pitches ruined this game then you need to learn how to hit my man

Its not false advertising if you don’t know how odds work

Simple solution: Make pickoffs more effective. Clearly the person that keeps taking the extra step is in the wrong. If they get picked off a couple times they won’t take the extra step again

Before anyone complains about these bosses you gotta know this is a DIRECT result of the complaints of the “there are way too many 99s I can’t compete” crowd from last year

@raesONE said in You can replay Run it Back Conquest or Showdown to get as many packs as you want...:

That's a nice feature, although I gotta be the negative Nancy to point out that these cards aren't all that intriguing and because everything is replayable, they'll be dirt cheap. Still hoping for a connection reward of some sorts.

Easy exchange farm for TAs. Whether the players are good or not, 5k stubs or 10 exchange points for doing what looks like a short conquest map is good.

MLB players don't swing at balls, or the pitchers would throw them more often. Quit swinging at them

95% of the community doesn’t care about flipping or making profits. They just want to sell the card

@dap1234567890 said in Is this the last Pujols card we see for a few years?:

@the_dragon1912 said in Is this the last Pujols card we see for a few years?:

@dap1234567890 said in Is this the last Pujols card we see for a few years?:

@the_dragon1912 said in Is this the last Pujols card we see for a few years?:

@dap1234567890 said in Is this the last Pujols card we see for a few years?:

@Ericulous1_PSN said in Is this the last Pujols card we see for a few years?:

@SaveFarris_PSN said in Is this the last Pujols card we see for a few years?:

A. Mauer's been on the cover (twice!) so he has a prior working relationship directly with SDS.

B. Absence makes the heart grow fonder. It's a whole lot easier to build up demand for a legend if they go away for awhile.

That makes sense. I was just using Mauer as an example since he just came back and we just lost Posey. But your reasoning makes perfect sense. The way people talk about losing players after they retire for several years makes it sound like a policy. Like they are ineligible for 5 years like the HOF.

The loss of players is a policy since the players are no longer a member of the MLBPA and would no longer be licensed for the game through the MLB Players, Inc (. SDS loses the rights to use their name, image, likeness, numbers, nicknames, signatures, playing records, and biographical data (all of that is known as "publicity rights") unless they work it with the former player's agent directly. When they enter the HoF, then the players fall under the license agreement with SDS has with the MLB HoF itself. You can see the image of these associations in the beginning off the game that shows they have agreements with the different associations. The time in between MLBPA and MLB HoF, the players are not represented by an association that is licensed by SDS. So again, the short way of saying this is that it is SDS and MLB policy they are not in the game after they retire!

There is no agreement with the hall of fame and the Hall has no authority to make such a deal. There's over 100 hall of famers not in the game and the HOF is nothing more than a Museum.

If SDS did not have an agreement with the MLB HoF, they would not be able to use their logo (among other things) in their game. So you are definitely wrong by saying they do not have an agreement with MLB HoF!

Agreement for the logo? Sure. The HOF has literally as much say on who gets put in the game as we do though. 11 Hall of famers have been removed from the game since legends were added to DD. Wouldn't happen if the HOF had anything to do with rights. Not to mention at minimum we would have at almost every hall of famer and negro league legend if the hall had a say

You are trying to play me as BooBoo the Fool if you think I'll believe that SDS just paid to flash a logo for the beginning of their game! Their is a lot more that comes with that agreement than a few second flash of that logo!

Could be, but it's not any players, I can tell you that with absolute certainty.

@dap1234567890 said in Is this the last Pujols card we see for a few years?:

@the_dragon1912 said in Is this the last Pujols card we see for a few years?:

@dap1234567890 said in Is this the last Pujols card we see for a few years?:

@Ericulous1_PSN said in Is this the last Pujols card we see for a few years?:

@SaveFarris_PSN said in Is this the last Pujols card we see for a few years?:

A. Mauer's been on the cover (twice!) so he has a prior working relationship directly with SDS.

B. Absence makes the heart grow fonder. It's a whole lot easier to build up demand for a legend if they go away for awhile.

That makes sense. I was just using Mauer as an example since he just came back and we just lost Posey. But your reasoning makes perfect sense. The way people talk about losing players after they retire for several years makes it sound like a policy. Like they are ineligible for 5 years like the HOF.

The loss of players is a policy since the players are no longer a member of the MLBPA and would no longer be licensed for the game through the MLB Players, Inc (. SDS loses the rights to use their name, image, likeness, numbers, nicknames, signatures, playing records, and biographical data (all of that is known as "publicity rights") unless they work it with the former player's agent directly. When they enter the HoF, then the players fall under the license agreement with SDS has with the MLB HoF itself. You can see the image of these associations in the beginning off the game that shows they have agreements with the different associations. The time in between MLBPA and MLB HoF, the players are not represented by an association that is licensed by SDS. So again, the short way of saying this is that it is SDS and MLB policy they are not in the game after they retire!

There is no agreement with the hall of fame and the Hall has no authority to make such a deal. There's over 100 hall of famers not in the game and the HOF is nothing more than a Museum.

If SDS did not have an agreement with the MLB HoF, they would not be able to use their logo (among other things) in their game. So you are definitely wrong by saying they do not have an agreement with MLB HoF!

Agreement for the logo? Sure. The HOF has literally as much say on who gets put in the game as we do though. 11 Hall of famers have been removed from the game since legends were added to DD(and that isn't counting Dawson and Rice). Wouldn't happen if the HOF had anything to do with rights. Not to mention at minimum we would have at almost every hall of famer and negro league legend if the hall had a say

@dap1234567890 said in Is this the last Pujols card we see for a few years?:

@Ericulous1_PSN said in Is this the last Pujols card we see for a few years?:

@SaveFarris_PSN said in Is this the last Pujols card we see for a few years?:

A. Mauer's been on the cover (twice!) so he has a prior working relationship directly with SDS.

B. Absence makes the heart grow fonder. It's a whole lot easier to build up demand for a legend if they go away for awhile.

That makes sense. I was just using Mauer as an example since he just came back and we just lost Posey. But your reasoning makes perfect sense. The way people talk about losing players after they retire for several years makes it sound like a policy. Like they are ineligible for 5 years like the HOF.

The loss of players is a policy since the players are no longer a member of the MLBPA and would no longer be licensed for the game through the MLB Players, Inc (. SDS loses the rights to use their name, image, likeness, numbers, nicknames, signatures, playing records, and biographical data (all of that is known as "publicity rights") unless they work it with the former player's agent directly. When they enter the HoF, then the players fall under the license agreement with SDS has with the MLB HoF itself. You can see the image of these associations in the beginning off the game that shows they have agreements with the different associations. The time in between MLBPA and MLB HoF, the players are not represented by an association that is licensed by SDS. So again, the short way of saying this is that it is SDS and MLB policy they are not in the game after they retire!

There is no agreement with the hall of fame and the Hall has no authority to make such a deal. There's over 100 hall of famers not in the game and the HOF is nothing more than a Museum.

That's what they did with Granderson. It's ultimately up to Pujols himself though(or his representatives).

@dap1234567890 said in Scouting Report Says! You have no friends.:

I wonder if each restart of a Moment is an added game because I know I haven't missed around 150 moments!

Could be, but there isn't very many moments that take me over 3 or 4 tries and I don't do more than 7-10 daily moments per program so it's more likely it just isn't calculating the way it should be

0 Casual Co-op
0 Custom Leagues
0 Franchise
35 MTO
4 Play Now(For the Dynamic difficulty trophies)
5 RTTS
203 BR
0 Casual Online
256 Conquest
0 DD Co-op
957 Events
Why do they still include extra innings?
205 Mini Seasons
1120 Moments
24 RS
173 Showdown
87 Hit for 8 AB's and Quit CPU games

You had to have locked him into a milestone collection. It's the only way for Ryan to be no sell

@Pennstatefencer_MLBTS said in Event matchmaking:

@elway7751_PSN said in Event matchmaking:

I'll never understand how matchmaking in events are determined. I'm a very below average player but every time I decide to get into an event I play guys way above my skill level and get killed in most games.
I don't play alot of events for this reason, I want to try and get the rewards but getting matched up against far superior players time after time is getting old

Event matchmaking is based on the current entry. If it's your first game, you will go up against someone else that is just starting out. Overall skill, record, and BR or ranked seasons performance is all irrelevant. The more games you win in an entry, the higher your level is for that entry and theoretically you would match up with other players with a similar number of wins. It's the same way BR works.

The problem is that there is no incentive to continue an entry in events this year. Lineups are saved, streak rewards suck, and you can tank 4 out of 5 rotation spots to lower your team overall which helps to get under the limit when there is one. Play one game with your top starter, then forfeit and reenter to get stamina back. I'm not saying it's right or wrong to do that. I'm just saying that is what most people do since SDS hasn't come up with a way to dissuade the strategy.

Next year they may want to try limiting the overall on individual cards instead of team overall. That would give less incentive for tanking your rotation, although people may still forfeit and reenter to use their favorite starter. Better streak rewards could help to keep you in a run, which means more variety on starting pitchers seen and a decrease in how often you see top tier players in a game one scenario. Maybe a limited number of forfeits per event? I do like that you can forfeit, but its currently a little OP. Maybe they can just adjust the current system a bit, but i have a feeling they will either leave it as is, or throw out the baby with the bathwater.

Something definitely should be done if they don't want people abusing the system. We all know what they would say though.

It's working as intended.

The easiest solution would just be to have energy for pitchers in events. Yeah there has been a lot of anything goes events, but honestly I think a lot of us that want heavy event restrictions are few and far between. The biggest problem is that event rewards are 100x better in general than Ranked rewards(not the cards, but that is all ranked has) Above average players have absolutely no reason to play Ranked, period. I don't really think streak rewards are an issue. Event streak rewards have been the same since 18 and they weren't an issue before

Finley, Posada, Durham. Aaron is unreal but thats way too basic of an answer

It has to be Below 75 power vs. both. I hit multiple homers with Kendall vs a righty and they didn't count towards that mission. I ended up using supercharged Realmuto and Vierling