@Easy_Duhz_It_ said in Won’t be buying 23 or 24 or 25…..:
@AnimalMother763_XBL said in Won’t be buying 23 or 24 or 25…..:
@Easy_Duhz_It_ said in Won’t be buying 23 or 24 or 25…..:
@AnimalMother763_XBL said in Won’t be buying 23 or 24 or 25…..:
@Easy_Duhz_It_ said in Won’t be buying 23 or 24 or 25…..:
Generic faces for Pujols and Molina make the game unplayable?
Yes. I had not purchased a version of the show in 2 seasons as I had not upgraded to a next gen console yet. During last years spring training when the Cardinals announced Pujols was coming back, I purchased a new console for the sole intention of getting the Show 22 to memorialize my two favorite current players final season. Everything was great for most of the year, and then, the final freaking patch of the game the development team ruined my immersion by yanking their faces out. Now my 3rd season in franchise mode I can’t even look at the generic faces. Game is wrecked for me.
None of what you said makes the game unplayable. You just dont wanna play it. Theres a difference.
Irrelevant. The outcome is the same. I’m a pissed off customer not enjoying a game that I had enjoyed right up to until the last patch, and I’ll be closing my wallet going forward if it’s not fixed (which I’m certain isn’t happening at this point.)
Thats a great story and all but it doesn't change the fact that what you said and the actual definition of the word "unplayable" are two completely different things.
So is it your English degree that informs you that the definition of the word “unplayable” never contains a subjective element?
When a game gets rained out because field conditions are “unplayable”, does it actually means people couldn’t go out there and physically play whatever game they were planning on playing? Absolutely not. It means someone made the subjective decision that the field was “unplayable”.
I may complain some of my fries are a bit burnt, that doesn't make them inedible to me.
Burnt fries are inedible. See above. Same issue. It’s subjective.