High Rep League
-
Just curious to see if this idea would be something people might be interested in seeing in upcoming iterations of the game. The premise is that it’s a mode that you must qualify for to be aloud to play. Basically it works based on community feedback and developer vetted. You must attain a certain level of reputation through online gameplay. If you act toxically in game you will suffer negative feedback. Whereas if you show good sportsmanship and act like a responsible individual during games you will aquire a good reputation. With this reputation you are then allowed to play in the High Rep League where the rewards are elite and the gameplay is competitive but free of the toxic behavior many resort to in RS to get undeserved victories. The catch to this is that you can only receive feedback from a certain person once. This is to avoid those that will exploit the system to matched up against their friends over and over, and negative feedback is vetted by the developers via gameplay footage to determine if the negative feedback is warranted. Once you have attained the proper level of reputation you must maintain that standing across all competitive modes to continue to be permitted access to the High Rep League. Should you fall below the threshold you will no longer have access and will have all progress halted and reset. The league will have seasons and will have fresh rewards every season. What is the communities thoughts on this idea. I think that it will make the online aspect a lot more tolerable to those who want a responsibly behaved atmosphere.
-
People would just give bad feedback to their opponent if they lost and I doubt SDS has the man hours available to go around 'vetting' if the good or bad feedback marks are deserved. Your talking about devoting thousands of hours (which is how much they'll need) to checking that.
-
@eatyum_psn said in High Rep League:
People would just give bad feedback to their opponent if they lost and I doubt SDS has the man hours available to go around 'vetting' if the good or bad feedback marks are deserved. Your talking about devoting thousands of hours (which is how much they'll need) to checking that.
This, what better way to be toxic then to max out giving the opponent you are playing all toxic feedback. Its sad, but I guarantee there are many people that would do just that. Feedback system wouldnt work.
-
Idea is great but toxic players will remain toxic. So they’d F up that idea. Plus we’ll start seeing team names like givemerep or something dumb like that.
-
Well it was just an idea. I guess there is nothing wrong with trying to find ways to improve the online environment for those who really would enjoy an environment free of the silly toxic bs that has destroyed our enjoyment.
-
We need smb3 pennant race in mlbts for regular teams
-
you’re “aloud” to have your opinion, but it’s wrong to offer suggestions bc the online environment is perfect as is
-
A admin locked this topic on
