My theory on XP...
-
So I've seen a few posts now about XP per game since double XP has been turned off, so we all know the higher the difficulty the more XP, correct, so I just played a game on All-Star vs. Astros using Pedro Martinez the Astros used McCullers, I as able to only allow 3 total hits in 9 innings I was getting 450 xp per half inning of pitching every time consistently so with this math 9 x 450=4050xp just from pitching so to say you can get 5k to 6k xp per play vs cpu on all star you could actually earn a lot of xp
-
Something is definitely off on XP. I played a 9 inning vs CPU on Hall of Fame, I won 3-1, struck out 11, got 3,755. Next game I played Conquest on Hall of Fame, won 8-1 in 4 innings, struck out 4, got 3,327. No way those two games should equal the same amount of XP. I get there’s more XP for hits, HR, XBh, and the like, but a game that goes longer shouldn’t be the same XP reward. Short answer is to just stick with Conquest.
Yesterday playing Conquest on All Star, I was averaging about 3,500 per game. So lesson here is All Star is better than Hall of Fame, which doesn’t make sense either.
-
A admin locked this topic on
