@C_ypress_H_ill said in Hitting in Showdown:
@eatyum said in Hitting in Showdown:
@C_ypress_H_ill said in Hitting in Showdown:
@eatyum said in Hitting in Showdown:
@C_ypress_H_ill said in Hitting in Showdown:
@theman925 said in Hitting in Showdown:
I don’t think anyone recommends to just put the control down till you get two strikes. BUT it is smart to take pitches, unless you enjoy making quick outs and getting the pitchers confidence up.
If the first pitch is right down the middle, I have to take? Doesn’t work that way in real baseball, why is that a thing in a game that wants to replicate real baseball?
The classic strawman argument, twisting his words into saying something different.
Ok. Then maybe you can explain to me why there’s a consensus of not swinging until 2 strikes in this game when clearly that doesn’t happen in real baseball and it shouldn’t be a thing in a game wanting to replicate real baseball. If I get a first pitch down the middle, why is it not good to go for it?
I don't subscribe to the take till two-strike theory. (Unless you find yourself constantly swinging at balls, in which case it might be helpful to watch a few to try and get comfortable.)
Nice try diverting from the main point though. You were still strawmaning, whether you want to admit it or not.
Call me whatever you want, I’m not here to talk about that.
I’m just curious because the other guy made a whole thread about the bad players not being patient in showdown and I’m just wondering why should you have to let good pitches go to avoid being “impatient”? If the CPU gives me a one first one down the middle, why should I feel like I have to take otherwise the game will nerf my early count hit? I’ve asked you twice now and you yourself are diverting from giving me a legit response.
I already gave you my answer, I don't subscribe to the wait till two-strike theory. I'll swing when I feel like it.
But again, you don't want to talk about "that" because you know it's strawman, but sure keep avoiding it, lol you aren't fooling anyone.
It's the only way people like you can "seem" smart, if you argue against something that wasn't said, you can easily make yourself win that fake argument. It's a classic move, but very obvious