New event
-
Event part 2 but no new rewards?!?
-
-
Lol I’m looking at it
-
@T-Rox_09 said in New event:
@buckeyefever1991 said in New event:
Event part 2 but no new rewards?!?
Where did you see this?
Event started last night when you go to the rewards screen rewards still only go up to 75 wins
-
Might be like the past event... maybe change it HOF difficulty
-
I don’t know if they are gonna add new rewards this time around or not. The first event was 3 weeks for part 1 and tons of people had got their 100 wins with the thought that new rewards were added in part 2. This event required 50-75 wins in 6 inning games in 1 week. Not very many people are at 50 wins
-
All the trouble for Bohm to now make it a cakewalk and add nothing more?
-
@jreypr said in New event:
All the trouble for Bohm to now make it a cakewalk and add nothing more?
Its value will tank in the next 24 hours for sure that card will be maybe 15k by the end of the event.
I struggle to 1st event only able to muster 15 wins. Not my best showing that's for sure but I really like the new event set up
-
@buckeyefever1991 said in New event:
Lol I’m looking at it
So you see it in game. Got it. Thought you saw it on the website or something.
-
Thank you for 3 inning games!!!!
-
@buckeyefever1991 said in New event:
Event part 2 but no new rewards?!?
Whenever Events are broken up into parts, you can be assured it's the same set of rewards.
-
Last time they added some rewards so they prob will again to like 100 wins.
-
They only added more rewards last time because of all the bitching and complaining everyone did, they specifically stated before all events that are 2 or 3 part events- the rewards are cumulative
-
what is it 3 innings and HOF?
-
The rewards structure and what it pertained to was explicitly stated this time, unlike the first rewards path.
Honestly, the way the elite players have approached Events like maniacs winning dozens of games in a week makes me long for the old structure where things were a bit more manageable once the top players moved on after the initial week.
-
@rymflaherty said in New event:
The rewards structure and what it pertained to was explicitly stated this time, unlike the first rewards path.
Honestly, the way the elite players have approached Events like maniacs winning dozens of games in a week makes me long for the old structure where things were a bit more manageable once the top players moved on after the initial week.
@rymflaherty said in New event:
The rewards structure and what it pertained to was explicitly stated this time, unlike the first rewards path.
Honestly, the way the elite players have approached Events like maniacs winning dozens of games in a week makes me long for the old structure where things were a bit more manageable once the top players moved on after the initial week.
I agree with this. 50 wins is a major grind. The
-
@rymflaherty said in New event:
The rewards structure and what it pertained to was explicitly stated this time, unlike the first rewards path.
Honestly, the way the elite players have approached Events like maniacs winning dozens of games in a week makes me long for the old structure where things were a bit more manageable once the top players moved on after the initial week.
So there won’t be new rewards is what you’re saying?
-
-
-
@the_dragon1912 said in New event:
I don’t know if they are gonna add new rewards this time around or not. The first event was 3 weeks for part 1 and tons of people had got their 100 wins with the thought that new rewards were added in part 2. This event required 50-75 wins in 6 inning games in 1 week. Not very many people are at 50 wins
[censored] man grey grind for those wins for stubs. Thinning they’d atleast add biah or headliners like last time for new rewards. Otherwise I don’t get the point of having different roster requirements if your going for same thing
