Perfect... 98 out of the pitchers hand... 93 off the bat...
-
I had this happen to me in RS. Not as bad but 100mph in, Perfect-Perfect, 98MPH out. And this bottom 9th 2 outs in a tie game. Ball died in CF and I lost in extra innings.
-
@Ikasnu said in Perfect... 98 out of the pitchers hand... 93 off the bat...:
That is something that 100% should be fixed. Regardless of the power stat, perfect perfect should always have equal or greater exit velo.
exactly! doesn't mean we are asking for perfect/perfect flies to always be HR for everyone, just that the physics some what follow real life realistic physics.
-
iT hAPpeNs iN rEAl bAsEBaLl
-
[censored] that sucks. I had 2 perfect flyballs yesterday, one with Yelich on Taylor rodgers(83 power vs L) and Eloy Jimenez on Jose Berrios (88 power vs R) both barely made it to the track. March to October in the ALCS(HOF) and the ladder in a showdown run, 1st boss(probably rookie/vet? Lol)
-
@Ikasnu said in Perfect... 98 out of the pitchers hand... 93 off the bat...:
That is something that 100% should be fixed. Regardless of the power stat, perfect perfect should always have equal or greater exit velo.
So even a perfect perfect bunt should have higher exit velo? The power or strength of a hitter of course should matter. If a 4 year old accidentally hit a ball with perfect timing and contact then the exit velo should be over 100 mph? You and others here obviously know zero about physics. Think of a wall being the batter. A pitcher throws the ball at the wall and the wall (with no power of its own) puts and equal and opposite force on the ball so the ball will rebound, but it isn't going anywhere and certainly not at a rate higher than the pitch was. The wall will absorb most of the balls energy and it will just bounce off. Perfect timing and perfect contact have nothing to do with how much power is put into a swing. It still takes a power from the batter to drive the ball at a speed higher than the pitch comes in. What you are suggesting is that no swing is even needed as long as there is perfect contact and perfect timing.
-
This post is deleted!
-
@Vipersneak said in Perfect... 98 out of the pitchers hand... 93 off the bat...:
@Ikasnu said in Perfect... 98 out of the pitchers hand... 93 off the bat...:
That is something that 100% should be fixed. Regardless of the power stat, perfect perfect should always have equal or greater exit velo.
So even a perfect perfect bunt should have higher exit velo? The power or strength of a hitter of course should matter. If a 4 year old accidentally hit a ball with perfect timing and contact then the exit velo should be over 100 mph? You and others here obviously know zero about physics. Think of a wall being the batter. A pitcher throws the ball at the wall and the wall (with no power of its own) puts and equal and opposite force on the ball so the ball will rebound, but it isn't going anywhere and certainly not at a rate higher than the pitch was. The wall will absorb most of the balls energy and it will just bounce off. Perfect timing and perfect contact have nothing to do with how much power is put into a swing. It still takes a power from the batter to drive the ball at a speed higher than the pitch comes in. What you are suggesting is that no swing is even needed as long as there is perfect contact and perfect timing.
All this made you sound dumb as hell. These are professional MLB players. They don’t swing the bat like a 4yr old. No MLB player will ever perfectly square up a ball and have negative velocity
-
@Ikasnu said in Perfect... 98 out of the pitchers hand... 93 off the bat...:
That is something that 100% should be fixed. Regardless of the power stat, perfect perfect should always have equal or greater exit velo.
There isn't a baseball player alive that hasn't had more exit velo than the pitch when barrelling up a ball, even Dee Gordon. Physics would tell you it always goes out faster. ijs. Not complaining at all, just stating a fact. I hit a good/squared up with Gallo to right center in the event and it hit the top of the wall. IRL that goes about 475. I just smiled.
-
@Vipersneak said in Perfect... 98 out of the pitchers hand... 93 off the bat...:
@Ikasnu said in Perfect... 98 out of the pitchers hand... 93 off the bat...:
That is something that 100% should be fixed. Regardless of the power stat, perfect perfect should always have equal or greater exit velo.
So even a perfect perfect bunt should have higher exit velo? The power or strength of a hitter of course should matter. If a 4 year old accidentally hit a ball with perfect timing and contact then the exit velo should be over 100 mph? You and others here obviously know zero about physics. Think of a wall being the batter. A pitcher throws the ball at the wall and the wall (with no power of its own) puts and equal and opposite force on the ball so the ball will rebound, but it isn't going anywhere and certainly not at a rate higher than the pitch was. The wall will absorb most of the balls energy and it will just bounce off. Perfect timing and perfect contact have nothing to do with how much power is put into a swing. It still takes a power from the batter to drive the ball at a speed higher than the pitch comes in. What you are suggesting is that no swing is even needed as long as there is perfect contact and perfect timing.
L.M.A.O.
I can’t believe this is your justification for why the hitting engine is the way it is. Comparing big league hitters to toddlers and brick walls is completely irrational and irrelevant.
-
@Ikasnu said in Perfect... 98 out of the pitchers hand... 93 off the bat...:
@Vipersneak said in Perfect... 98 out of the pitchers hand... 93 off the bat...:
@Ikasnu said in Perfect... 98 out of the pitchers hand... 93 off the bat...:
That is something that 100% should be fixed. Regardless of the power stat, perfect perfect should always have equal or greater exit velo.
So even a perfect perfect bunt should have higher exit velo? The power or strength of a hitter of course should matter. If a 4 year old accidentally hit a ball with perfect timing and contact then the exit velo should be over 100 mph? You and others here obviously know zero about physics. Think of a wall being the batter. A pitcher throws the ball at the wall and the wall (with no power of its own) puts and equal and opposite force on the ball so the ball will rebound, but it isn't going anywhere and certainly not at a rate higher than the pitch was. The wall will absorb most of the balls energy and it will just bounce off. Perfect timing and perfect contact have nothing to do with how much power is put into a swing. It still takes a power from the batter to drive the ball at a speed higher than the pitch comes in. What you are suggesting is that no swing is even needed as long as there is perfect contact and perfect timing.
So are you dumb or just stupid?
How about an explanation instead of just hurling insults? That’s what this fellow has gone to the effort of doing. Science is about asking questions of the non-rhetoric kind.
Remember all of those flat-earthers who shut down the questions about the world possibly being round? We all laugh at them, not the ones who theorised.
-
@Red_Ted_is_back said in Perfect... 98 out of the pitchers hand... 93 off the bat...:
@Ikasnu said in Perfect... 98 out of the pitchers hand... 93 off the bat...:
@Vipersneak said in Perfect... 98 out of the pitchers hand... 93 off the bat...:
@Ikasnu said in Perfect... 98 out of the pitchers hand... 93 off the bat...:
That is something that 100% should be fixed. Regardless of the power stat, perfect perfect should always have equal or greater exit velo.
So even a perfect perfect bunt should have higher exit velo? The power or strength of a hitter of course should matter. If a 4 year old accidentally hit a ball with perfect timing and contact then the exit velo should be over 100 mph? You and others here obviously know zero about physics. Think of a wall being the batter. A pitcher throws the ball at the wall and the wall (with no power of its own) puts and equal and opposite force on the ball so the ball will rebound, but it isn't going anywhere and certainly not at a rate higher than the pitch was. The wall will absorb most of the balls energy and it will just bounce off. Perfect timing and perfect contact have nothing to do with how much power is put into a swing. It still takes a power from the batter to drive the ball at a speed higher than the pitch comes in. What you are suggesting is that no swing is even needed as long as there is perfect contact and perfect timing.
So are you dumb or just stupid?
How about an explanation instead of just hurling insults? That’s what this fellow has gone to the effort of doing. Science is about asking questions of the non-rhetoric kind.
Remember all of those flat-earthers who shut down the questions about the world possibly being round? We all laugh at them, not the ones who theorised.
Did you read what he posted at all?
-
It is a shame I am refraining from complaining.
-
@Ikasnu said in Perfect... 98 out of the pitchers hand... 93 off the bat...:
@Red_Ted_is_back said in Perfect... 98 out of the pitchers hand... 93 off the bat...:
@Ikasnu said in Perfect... 98 out of the pitchers hand... 93 off the bat...:
@Vipersneak said in Perfect... 98 out of the pitchers hand... 93 off the bat...:
@Ikasnu said in Perfect... 98 out of the pitchers hand... 93 off the bat...:
That is something that 100% should be fixed. Regardless of the power stat, perfect perfect should always have equal or greater exit velo.
So even a perfect perfect bunt should have higher exit velo? The power or strength of a hitter of course should matter. If a 4 year old accidentally hit a ball with perfect timing and contact then the exit velo should be over 100 mph? You and others here obviously know zero about physics. Think of a wall being the batter. A pitcher throws the ball at the wall and the wall (with no power of its own) puts and equal and opposite force on the ball so the ball will rebound, but it isn't going anywhere and certainly not at a rate higher than the pitch was. The wall will absorb most of the balls energy and it will just bounce off. Perfect timing and perfect contact have nothing to do with how much power is put into a swing. It still takes a power from the batter to drive the ball at a speed higher than the pitch comes in. What you are suggesting is that no swing is even needed as long as there is perfect contact and perfect timing.
So are you dumb or just stupid?
How about an explanation instead of just hurling insults? That’s what this fellow has gone to the effort of doing. Science is about asking questions of the non-rhetoric kind.
Remember all of those flat-earthers who shut down the questions about the world possibly being round? We all laugh at them, not the ones who theorised.
Did you read what he posted at all?
Yes I did. Not saying it was correct or not.
-
I just played a game and 18 out of the 27 outs were over 95mph exit velo and I had like 5 hits in the game
-
@Red_Ted_is_back said in Perfect... 98 out of the pitchers hand... 93 off the bat...:
@Ikasnu said in Perfect... 98 out of the pitchers hand... 93 off the bat...:
@Vipersneak said in Perfect... 98 out of the pitchers hand... 93 off the bat...:
@Ikasnu said in Perfect... 98 out of the pitchers hand... 93 off the bat...:
That is something that 100% should be fixed. Regardless of the power stat, perfect perfect should always have equal or greater exit velo.
So even a perfect perfect bunt should have higher exit velo? The power or strength of a hitter of course should matter. If a 4 year old accidentally hit a ball with perfect timing and contact then the exit velo should be over 100 mph? You and others here obviously know zero about physics. Think of a wall being the batter. A pitcher throws the ball at the wall and the wall (with no power of its own) puts and equal and opposite force on the ball so the ball will rebound, but it isn't going anywhere and certainly not at a rate higher than the pitch was. The wall will absorb most of the balls energy and it will just bounce off. Perfect timing and perfect contact have nothing to do with how much power is put into a swing. It still takes a power from the batter to drive the ball at a speed higher than the pitch comes in. What you are suggesting is that no swing is even needed as long as there is perfect contact and perfect timing.
So are you dumb or just stupid?
How about an explanation instead of just hurling insults? That’s what this fellow has gone to the effort of doing. Science is about asking questions of the non-rhetoric kind.
Remember all of those flat-earthers who shut down the questions about the world possibly being round? We all laugh at them, not the ones who theorised.
Wait, what? The world is round? If the world is round, then why aren't baseballs flat?
-
That is a perfectly acceptable outcome with 51 power.
-
Moran's top dot is the smallest of the three, clearly indicating that is his weakest contact point.
-
51 power means he doesn't swing as hard. 99mph fastball even when barreled requires enough force in the swing to hit the ball harder than it's pitched.
-
Pitch is at the bottom of the zone.
If you got that in the middle or lower dot and gotten a line drive or ground ball you probably would've had a better chance for a hit. This wans't a you problem, it was a Bronze Colin Moran problem
️ -
-
@coastereight said in Perfect... 98 out of the pitchers hand... 93 off the bat...:
@Red_Ted_is_back said in Perfect... 98 out of the pitchers hand... 93 off the bat...:
@Ikasnu said in Perfect... 98 out of the pitchers hand... 93 off the bat...:
@Vipersneak said in Perfect... 98 out of the pitchers hand... 93 off the bat...:
@Ikasnu said in Perfect... 98 out of the pitchers hand... 93 off the bat...:
That is something that 100% should be fixed. Regardless of the power stat, perfect perfect should always have equal or greater exit velo.
So even a perfect perfect bunt should have higher exit velo? The power or strength of a hitter of course should matter. If a 4 year old accidentally hit a ball with perfect timing and contact then the exit velo should be over 100 mph? You and others here obviously know zero about physics. Think of a wall being the batter. A pitcher throws the ball at the wall and the wall (with no power of its own) puts and equal and opposite force on the ball so the ball will rebound, but it isn't going anywhere and certainly not at a rate higher than the pitch was. The wall will absorb most of the balls energy and it will just bounce off. Perfect timing and perfect contact have nothing to do with how much power is put into a swing. It still takes a power from the batter to drive the ball at a speed higher than the pitch comes in. What you are suggesting is that no swing is even needed as long as there is perfect contact and perfect timing.
So are you dumb or just stupid?
How about an explanation instead of just hurling insults? That’s what this fellow has gone to the effort of doing. Science is about asking questions of the non-rhetoric kind.
Remember all of those flat-earthers who shut down the questions about the world possibly being round? We all laugh at them, not the ones who theorised.
Wait, what? The world is round? If the world is round, then why aren't baseballs flat?
If the Earth was flat cats would have knocked everything off by now.
-
If we are talking about exit velocities then let’s talk about how Michael Lorenzen had the highest average exit velocity of any player in the MLB last year. That includes Aaron Judge and Joey Gallo. Let’s give Lorenzen the power he deserves SDS, 100 power minimum
-
My entire point is that perfect timing and perfect contact (perfect/perfect in this game) are not the most important thing when it comes to exit velocity. Bat speed is the most important thing. For example, a wall always has perfect timing and contact, but it has no bat speed. So saying that the batters power (or bat speed) does not matter is completely wrong. People are literally saying that the batter should not matter as long as the ball is hit perfect/perfect, and that is not true. A batter with a lower power rating is not going to hit the ball, on average, with as much exit velocity as someone with a higher power rating. You would think this is obvious, I guess not.
-
As a coach, give me a player with poor mechanics and great bat speed, and I will always take him over the player with great mechanics and poor bat speed.
