"Unlockable" Idea For MLBTS22
-
They have that. It's called IE.
-
No thanks. We are the managers so no need for a manager card to help overinflate attributes even more.
-
I wouldn’t be opposed to managers as long as they are cosmetic only, who doesn’t want to see Jim Leyland in their dugout hacking a dart?.
-
@jeezy-e_psn said in "Unlockable" Idea For MLBTS22:
I wouldn’t be opposed to managers as long as they are cosmetic only, who doesn’t want to see Jim Leyland in their dugout hacking a dart?.
Ok. This I can agree with. Give me a Casey Stengel, Connie Mack or John McGraw pacing the dugout.
-
Sweet Lou kicking dirt at the umpire! +3 attribute boost for 1 inning. I'm in.
Seriously, though, no.
-
@jeezy-e_psn said in "Unlockable" Idea For MLBTS22:
I wouldn’t be opposed to managers as long as they are cosmetic only, who doesn’t want to see Jim Leyland in their dugout hacking a dart?.
I always thought its odd you dont get to pick your manager or at least make one, especially the current sprite are brutal
-
That’s a no from me. I don’t want to have to pay for a diamond manager just to be on a level playing field with everyone else. People would just use whoever has the best perks anyway, negating the whole point of using who you want to use. Obviously none of that would be an issue if they were purely cosmetic though. But SDS would have to get the individual rights for any retired managers (maybe even current managers too, don’t know if they’re included in the MLBPA deal), which would be money and effort much better spent on actual players instead.
-
@jogger171717_psn said in "Unlockable" Idea For MLBTS22:
That’s a no from me. I don’t want to have to pay for a diamond manager just to be on a level playing field with everyone else. People would just use whoever has the best perks anyway, negating the whole point of using who you want to use. Obviously none of that would be an issue if they were purely cosmetic though. But SDS would have to get the individual rights for any retired managers (maybe even current managers too, don’t know if they’re included in the MLBPA deal), which would be money and effort much better spent on actual players instead.
They have to be purely cosmetic otherwise we are heading into EA territory
-
Id rather just have the option of being able to adjust how many bench players and RP you can have on the team
-
I want LaRussa for the +power roid bonus.
-
A admin locked this topic on
