<![CDATA[80-90IP to diamond mod a reliever?]]>I know a lot of us flagged the very obvious problem with relievers having the same innings pitched criteria as starters for a diamond mod, however has SDS ever actually commented on it?

I'm fascinated to know if it was intentional or simply an error with a new system that they've simply ignored.

Fwiw, despite a crazy amount of hours i only have two relievers who have hit the 80IP threshold (and one to the 90). I suspect many others are the same.

]]>https://forums.theshow.com/topic/84628/80-90ip-to-diamond-mod-a-relieverRSS for NodeSun, 30 Aug 2026 03:13:42 GMTSat, 29 Aug 2026 05:11:29 GMT60<![CDATA[Reply to 80-90IP to diamond mod a reliever? on Sun, 30 Aug 2026 01:17:24 GMT]]>I couldn’t care less how other people use them. It gives us significantly more control over building our teams. That’s a good thing. They should get rid of a good thing because you don’t understand them? Get out of here.

]]>https://forums.theshow.com/post/778257https://forums.theshow.com/post/778257Sun, 30 Aug 2026 01:17:24 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to 80-90IP to diamond mod a reliever? on Sat, 29 Aug 2026 23:34:00 GMT]]>@GoozeFn_PSN Disagree.
I think it's flawed, not explained properly and as a result people use them ineffectively.
Each to their own, though.

]]>https://forums.theshow.com/post/778248https://forums.theshow.com/post/778248Sat, 29 Aug 2026 23:34:00 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to 80-90IP to diamond mod a reliever? on Sat, 29 Aug 2026 21:44:08 GMT]]>@NotesOfJohn_PSN That would be awful. The mods are great. It’s literally the only good thing they did this year. Pitching just needs an adjustment.

]]>https://forums.theshow.com/post/778244https://forums.theshow.com/post/778244Sat, 29 Aug 2026 21:44:08 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to 80-90IP to diamond mod a reliever? on Sat, 29 Aug 2026 20:33:39 GMT]]>@GoozeFn_PSN They are.
I'm sure they'll adjust next year (I would prefer they went back to last years model, though) but i'm disappointed they didn't act on the feedback this year.

]]>https://forums.theshow.com/post/778240https://forums.theshow.com/post/778240Sat, 29 Aug 2026 20:33:39 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to 80-90IP to diamond mod a reliever? on Sat, 29 Aug 2026 15:56:24 GMT]]>I have a lot of P5 pitchers and the only ones that have enough stats to actually mod are Felix and Anibal Sanchez because they were in my rotation for so long. The stat requirements are a joke for pitchers.

]]>https://forums.theshow.com/post/778222https://forums.theshow.com/post/778222Sat, 29 Aug 2026 15:56:24 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to 80-90IP to diamond mod a reliever? on Sat, 29 Aug 2026 15:12:24 GMT]]>Yeah I agree it’s preposterous, especially considering the rate in which pitchers are phased out as better ones come. It’s nearly impossible to reach the diamond mods with any pitchers ESPECIALLY relivers

]]>https://forums.theshow.com/post/778218https://forums.theshow.com/post/778218Sat, 29 Aug 2026 15:12:24 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to 80-90IP to diamond mod a reliever? on Sat, 29 Aug 2026 06:14:51 GMT]]>Wasn't it always easier to P5 at least starting pitchers in the past?

]]>https://forums.theshow.com/post/778211https://forums.theshow.com/post/778211Sat, 29 Aug 2026 06:14:51 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to 80-90IP to diamond mod a reliever? on Sat, 29 Aug 2026 06:02:05 GMT]]>I’ve been struggling to P5 pitchers in general. And of the ones I have, I think only Felix has enough innings for a mod.

I love the idea of parallel mods, but I do think they need an adjustment for next year. For instance, +9 for a full power mod doesn’t move the needle enough for me. Make it like +12 or something.

]]>https://forums.theshow.com/post/778208https://forums.theshow.com/post/778208Sat, 29 Aug 2026 06:02:05 GMT