<![CDATA[Pack odds - there is no reason for them to not be accurate.]]>I'm so tired of EVERYTHING these days being gambling. This is a video game, if the odds for Ballin packs are 1 in 15 and I open 20 of them I [censored] well should get a diamond. These aren't scratch tickets, it's just code in a video game. Stop being so [censored] cheap with everything.
The odds listed are not accurate whatsoever.

]]>https://forums.theshow.com/topic/82413/pack-odds-there-is-no-reason-for-them-to-not-be-accurate.RSS for NodeSat, 02 May 2026 02:22:03 GMTThu, 30 Apr 2026 20:24:45 GMT60<![CDATA[Reply to Pack odds - there is no reason for them to not be accurate. on Fri, 01 May 2026 17:56:13 GMT]]>@LHUBison58_XBL All good jokes and sarcasm aren’t always easy to detect through text. Just giving you a hard time. I’ve gone through some dry stretches too, but it always seems to even out.

]]>https://forums.theshow.com/post/752546https://forums.theshow.com/post/752546Fri, 01 May 2026 17:56:13 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Pack odds - there is no reason for them to not be accurate. on Fri, 01 May 2026 17:43:00 GMT]]>@GoozeFn_PSN Sorry if I was a bit testy. After the bs I went through at launch I don’t take kindly to being told my opinion doesn’t belong.

]]>https://forums.theshow.com/post/752538https://forums.theshow.com/post/752538Fri, 01 May 2026 17:43:00 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Pack odds - there is no reason for them to not be accurate. on Fri, 01 May 2026 17:35:39 GMT]]>@LHUBison58_XBL Again, it was a joke. My pack luck has been very good as well, Judge, Soto x3, Stanton, Skenes, Lindor…

]]>https://forums.theshow.com/post/752534https://forums.theshow.com/post/752534Fri, 01 May 2026 17:35:39 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Pack odds - there is no reason for them to not be accurate. on Fri, 01 May 2026 17:32:30 GMT]]>@GoozeFn_PSN I wasn’t whining. I posted my FACTS in a discussion about pack odds. In full disclosure I mentioned my pulls. You get envious and start telling me my voice doesn’t count? Your voice is no different than mine. As long as what I post is factually correct I will have zero guilt over it.

]]>https://forums.theshow.com/post/752532https://forums.theshow.com/post/752532Fri, 01 May 2026 17:32:30 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Pack odds - there is no reason for them to not be accurate. on Fri, 01 May 2026 17:29:20 GMT]]>@LHUBison58_XBL Quit whining about packs when your luck is better than 99% of the community, man.

]]>https://forums.theshow.com/post/752529https://forums.theshow.com/post/752529Fri, 01 May 2026 17:29:20 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Pack odds - there is no reason for them to not be accurate. on Fri, 01 May 2026 17:27:39 GMT]]>@LHUBison58_XBL It was a joke, but you have no room to complain about packs.

]]>https://forums.theshow.com/post/752528https://forums.theshow.com/post/752528Fri, 01 May 2026 17:27:39 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Pack odds - there is no reason for them to not be accurate. on Fri, 01 May 2026 17:27:25 GMT]]>@GoozeFn_PSN so get beyond my standard pack pulls. The BIAH have been garbage for me. I have the proof. Quit whining about my cards, man.

]]>https://forums.theshow.com/post/752527https://forums.theshow.com/post/752527Fri, 01 May 2026 17:27:25 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Pack odds - there is no reason for them to not be accurate. on Fri, 01 May 2026 17:25:49 GMT]]>@LHUBison58_XBL Pulling both in less than 2 months is also a statistical outlier.

]]>https://forums.theshow.com/post/752526https://forums.theshow.com/post/752526Fri, 01 May 2026 17:25:49 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Pack odds - there is no reason for them to not be accurate. on Fri, 01 May 2026 17:24:08 GMT]]>@GoozeFn_PSN and stating that it was frustrating annoyed you? Seriously? I think there is something else at play.

]]>https://forums.theshow.com/post/752523https://forums.theshow.com/post/752523Fri, 01 May 2026 17:24:08 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Pack odds - there is no reason for them to not be accurate. on Fri, 01 May 2026 17:20:11 GMT]]>@GoozeFn_PSN There is zero connection between the two. They came out of totally separate types of packs. 1-400 is a statical outlier for BIAH packs.

]]>https://forums.theshow.com/post/752518https://forums.theshow.com/post/752518Fri, 01 May 2026 17:20:11 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Pack odds - there is no reason for them to not be accurate. on Fri, 01 May 2026 17:20:21 GMT]]>@GoozeFn_PSN what i thought. Are you sure its not programmed to say ok 15 ohtanis were pulled today by their system worsening odds for everyone else. I think it could be reasonable to think this way. Again not a hill im willing to die on. Just making conversation. We do not know what their programs are doing good behind the scenes.

]]>https://forums.theshow.com/post/752515https://forums.theshow.com/post/752515Fri, 01 May 2026 17:20:21 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Pack odds - there is no reason for them to not be accurate. on Fri, 01 May 2026 17:14:04 GMT]]>@MarioMendoza935_XBL LOL

]]>https://forums.theshow.com/post/752514https://forums.theshow.com/post/752514Fri, 01 May 2026 17:14:04 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Pack odds - there is no reason for them to not be accurate. on Fri, 01 May 2026 17:13:12 GMT]]>@Ditka06_MLBTS That’s not how odds work at all. Every pack has the same odds. They are increasing their odds, but that has zero effect on your odds.

]]>https://forums.theshow.com/post/752513https://forums.theshow.com/post/752513Fri, 01 May 2026 17:13:12 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Pack odds - there is no reason for them to not be accurate. on Fri, 01 May 2026 17:07:59 GMT]]>

@GoozeFn_PSN said:

orth son and not even close to the most.

I've read every single one. All pure gold.

]]>https://forums.theshow.com/post/752512https://forums.theshow.com/post/752512Fri, 01 May 2026 17:07:59 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Pack odds - there is no reason for them to not be accurate. on Fri, 01 May 2026 17:06:34 GMT]]>@GoozeFn_PSN but what if all these cheaters opening up thousands of packs are indeed lowering our odds? Its been proven the cheating is worse then we ever imagined.

]]>https://forums.theshow.com/post/752510https://forums.theshow.com/post/752510Fri, 01 May 2026 17:06:34 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Pack odds - there is no reason for them to not be accurate. on Fri, 01 May 2026 16:43:31 GMT]]>@LHUBison58_XBL I’m not doubting that you pulled them. I’m just a little Annoyed that you have and have the audacity to complain about your pack luck.

]]>https://forums.theshow.com/post/752498https://forums.theshow.com/post/752498Fri, 01 May 2026 16:43:31 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Pack odds - there is no reason for them to not be accurate. on Fri, 01 May 2026 16:36:46 GMT]]>@GoozeFn_PSN There is zero IF about it. I have the pull pics and the open pack history to prove it. I’ve grinded my cheeks off to get my packs. I got lucky, sure, but that shouldn’t disqualify the fact I’ve gone 1-400 in BIAH packs. It’s still absurd how many BIAH packs I’ve burned.

]]>https://forums.theshow.com/post/752494https://forums.theshow.com/post/752494Fri, 01 May 2026 16:36:46 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Pack odds - there is no reason for them to not be accurate. on Fri, 01 May 2026 15:25:23 GMT]]>@LHUBison58_XBL If you’ve pulled Judge and Ohtani this early, you have nothing to complain about. You could go 0-1000 and still be winning.

]]>https://forums.theshow.com/post/752456https://forums.theshow.com/post/752456Fri, 01 May 2026 15:25:23 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Pack odds - there is no reason for them to not be accurate. on Fri, 01 May 2026 15:02:24 GMT]]>@Ditka06_MLBTS

Yep, I actually dread opening packs and with cheaters earning hundreds if not thousands of packs the odds feel like they are worse than ever. I just expect absolutely nothing and am still somehow disappointed when I see that rare blue card and inevitably it’s an 85/86 3K quick sell.

]]>https://forums.theshow.com/post/752445https://forums.theshow.com/post/752445Fri, 01 May 2026 15:02:24 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Pack odds - there is no reason for them to not be accurate. on Fri, 01 May 2026 14:57:04 GMT]]>@TheRupster12_XBL I went through my open pack history. I’m 1-400+. I’m paying for pulling Judge in my now and laters and Ohtani in a free standard pack.

It’s really frustrating.

]]>https://forums.theshow.com/post/752444https://forums.theshow.com/post/752444Fri, 01 May 2026 14:57:04 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Pack odds - there is no reason for them to not be accurate. on Fri, 01 May 2026 14:49:39 GMT]]>@ryguy034753_XBL right how dare someone challenge you your majesty.

]]>https://forums.theshow.com/post/752437https://forums.theshow.com/post/752437Fri, 01 May 2026 14:49:39 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Pack odds - there is no reason for them to not be accurate. on Fri, 01 May 2026 14:31:01 GMT]]>@aaronjw76_PSN I know how the odds work. Its 1 and 50 for every pack you open. Just spit balling saying maybe better if its a guaranteed 1 out of every 50. Its really not that deep. Im fine the way it is. This is not a hill id be willing to die on. I just dont like knowing cheaters are getting hundreds if not thousands of packs for free.

]]>https://forums.theshow.com/post/752428https://forums.theshow.com/post/752428Fri, 01 May 2026 14:31:01 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Pack odds - there is no reason for them to not be accurate. on Fri, 01 May 2026 14:22:28 GMT]]>Statistics needs to be taught starting in kindergarten smh

]]>https://forums.theshow.com/post/752427https://forums.theshow.com/post/752427Fri, 01 May 2026 14:22:28 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Pack odds - there is no reason for them to not be accurate. on Fri, 01 May 2026 14:20:31 GMT]]>@Ditka06_MLBTS Not sure how you could do that effectively. I think it’s fine how it is. If you’re having bad luck, go earn so more packs. It evens out.

]]>https://forums.theshow.com/post/752425https://forums.theshow.com/post/752425Fri, 01 May 2026 14:20:31 GMT