<![CDATA[Ratings Need to Make Sense Again]]>Ratings should not be based on the meta or randomly thrown together illogically. On no planet is 1999 Randy a 92 rating. He pitched 270 innings with 364 Ks but gave up 30 homers, yet has an HR rate of 67. Can we at least go back to slightly realistic ratings again? We all know DD is not simulation-style baseball, but ratings need to change; this feels silly.

]]>https://forums.theshow.com/topic/81898/ratings-need-to-make-sense-againRSS for NodeSat, 11 Apr 2026 20:29:54 GMTFri, 10 Apr 2026 23:11:24 GMT60<![CDATA[Reply to Ratings Need to Make Sense Again on Sat, 11 Apr 2026 13:48:44 GMT]]>@ApolloZ_99_MLBTS I mean no but they could have made the lower overall like expos Randy or Yankees Randy. Not prime Randy Johnson I think that’s more aless what he’s saying.

]]>https://forums.theshow.com/post/746998https://forums.theshow.com/post/746998Sat, 11 Apr 2026 13:48:44 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Ratings Need to Make Sense Again on Sat, 11 Apr 2026 13:13:08 GMT]]>They ain’t gonna released a 99 Randy this early in the year. Nor should they.

]]>https://forums.theshow.com/post/746993https://forums.theshow.com/post/746993Sat, 11 Apr 2026 13:13:08 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Ratings Need to Make Sense Again on Sat, 11 Apr 2026 00:47:51 GMT]]>

@Jacob151167_XBL said:

Ratings should not be based on the meta or randomly thrown together illogically. On no planet is 1999 Randy a 92 rating. He pitched 270 innings with 364 Ks but gave up 30 homers, yet has an HR rate of 67. Can we at least go back to slightly realistic ratings again? We all know DD is not simulation-style baseball, but ratings need to change; this feels silly.

Card is based on his 1998 season. He had a 3.28 era and gave up 23 HRs that season.

]]>https://forums.theshow.com/post/746928https://forums.theshow.com/post/746928Sat, 11 Apr 2026 00:47:51 GMT